 | reply to WA_Resident
Re: Works for me.... said by WA_Resident:So why aren't we seeing any cable operators offering 343Mbps speeds?.........They don't even offer 100MBps symmetrical. Fiber networks have been offering residents 100/100MBps speeds since 2001 in Washington state. They offered Tv programming with video on demand and phone service since 2001 as well. And how much a month are they charging for 100/100? Comcast charges over $100/month for 50/10. True can offer much higher speeds, but the price would be so high that no one could afford it. -- »Please check out my friend's band |
|
|
|
 wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | said by fonzbear2000:said by WA_Resident:So why aren't we seeing any cable operators offering 343Mbps speeds?.........They don't even offer 100MBps symmetrical. Fiber networks have been offering residents 100/100MBps speeds since 2001 in Washington state. They offered Tv programming with video on demand and phone service since 2001 as well. And how much a month are they charging for 100/100? Comcast charges over $100/month for 50/10. True can offer much higher speeds, but the price would be so high that no one could afford it. In case it isnt clear that guy is clearly shilling for his own company. You can check the domain from before he signed up to be a full member..... -- God bless America, God bless our troops, and God help us destroy the Islamic terrorists.
»www.theadvocates.org/quizp/index.html
|
|
 wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | »portal.genext.us/contact/signup_bundle.shtml |
|
 | reply to fonzbear2000 said by fonzbear2000:said by WA_Resident:So why aren't we seeing any cable operators offering 343Mbps speeds?.........They don't even offer 100MBps symmetrical. Fiber networks have been offering residents 100/100MBps speeds since 2001 in Washington state. They offered Tv programming with video on demand and phone service since 2001 as well. And how much a month are they charging for 100/100? Comcast charges over $100/month for 50/10. True can offer much higher speeds, but the price would be so high that no one could afford it. A cool $40 (39.95) in my county, $45 in another county for supposedly 114MBps per month and no caps from this particular ISP.
Don't believe me?....Take a look!
Read it and weep!  »seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/t···p_h.html |
|
 | reply to wifi4milez said by wifi4milez:In case it isnt clear that guy is clearly shilling for his own company. You can check the domain from before he signed up to be a full member..... My own company?.....Do you mean my ISP provider which i haven't even mentioned once?
I'm praising public utilities (PUDs) that offer high speed fiber optic connections in rural areas. |
|
 | reply to WA_Resident WOW! I'm a bit jealous! I still can't complain about my 12/2 connection with a 250GB/month cap which I'll NEVER come close to going over though. That just shows you the greed of the big, giant companies such as Comcast and Verizon who could offer more speed for less, but we'll never see it because companies who offer the same type of internet don't compete with each other so it's almost a monopoly. Hell, the competitor here is Qwest DSL which prevents any other phone company from offering FTTH. Oh well, better than living where there's no internet and having to get satellite with 200MB/month caps(PUKE!). -- »Please check out my friend's band |
|
 | said by fonzbear2000:WOW! I'm a bit jealous! I still can't complain about my 12/2 connection with a 250GB/month cap which I'll NEVER come close to going over though. That just shows you the greed of the big, giant companies such as Comcast and Verizon who could offer more speed for less, but we'll never see it because companies who offer the same type of internet don't compete with each other so it's almost a monopoly. Hell, the competitor here is Qwest DSL which prevents any other phone company from offering FTTH. Oh well, better than living where there's no internet and having to get satellite with 200MB/month caps(PUKE!). Well, it's kinda of weird with prices and caps around here because in my county there's 8 ISPs that offer internet through the Public Utility District's fiber network and only 2 of them offer the 100MB connections with no caps, one charges $39.95 while the other one is $35.95. Another ISP also offers 100MB connection with a 25G per month cap for $39.95. The rest of them offer lesser speeds (down to 2mb), some have caps and some don't and they all cost $40 per month with the exeption of one ISP (which is a bit expensive).
The next county over also has a fiber network and none of the ISPs provide anywhere close to 100MBps. IFiber which offers the 114Mbps connections (mentioned in the article) only offers 6mb/768k for $35 and 12MB/768k for $40 in that particular county. Seems like the county PUD is throttling/regulating the speed.
Grant county (mentioned in the article) also has some ISPs with lower speeds and caps. Out of the bunch there is a couple with no caps and truely high speed.
The ISPs can offer low priced internet because they don't have to maintain any of the fiber network since that is owned and maintained by the Public Utility Disctrict which even takes the fiber right to the outside of your home.
Telecommunication companies tried to stop the PUDs in WA state from offering fiber optics to residents but they failed. Still, the PUDs can't offer any services (internet, TV, Phone) directly to their customers, this is why they contract out to ISPs. |
|
 | said by WA_Resident:said by fonzbear2000:WOW! I'm a bit jealous! I still can't complain about my 12/2 connection with a 250GB/month cap which I'll NEVER come close to going over though. That just shows you the greed of the big, giant companies such as Comcast and Verizon who could offer more speed for less, but we'll never see it because companies who offer the same type of internet don't compete with each other so it's almost a monopoly. Hell, the competitor here is Qwest DSL which prevents any other phone company from offering FTTH. Oh well, better than living where there's no internet and having to get satellite with 200MB/month caps(PUKE!). Well, it's kinda of weird with prices and caps around here because in my county there's 8 ISPs that offer internet through the Public Utility District's fiber network and only 2 of them offer the 100MB connections with no caps, one charges $39.95 while the other one is $35.95. Another ISP also offers 100MB connection with a 25G per month cap for $39.95. The rest of them offer lesser speeds (down to 2mb), some have caps and some don't and they all cost $40 per month with the exeption of one ISP (which is a bit expensive). The next county over also has a fiber network and none of the ISPs provide anywhere close to 100MBps. IFiber which offers the 114Mbps connections (mentioned in the article) only offers 6mb/768k for $35 and 12MB/768k for $40 in that particular county. Seems like the county PUD is throttling/regulating the speed. Grant county (mentioned in the article) also has some ISPs with lower speeds and caps. Out of the bunch there is a couple with no caps and truely high speed. The ISPs can offer low priced internet because they don't have to maintain any of the fiber network since that is owned and maintained by the Public Utility Disctrict which even takes the fiber right to the outside of your home. Telecommunication companies tried to stop the PUDs in WA state from offering fiber optics to residents but they failed. Still, the PUDs can't offer any services (internet, TV, Phone) directly to their customers, this is why they contract out to ISPs. Can you give direct links to the ISP's and their pricing plans? That almost seems too good to be true.
Also, is there a forum for them on this site? -- »Please check out my friend's band |
|
 | said by fonzbear2000:Can you give direct links to the ISP's and their pricing plans? That almost seems too good to be true. Also, is there a forum for them on this site? LocalTel (NWI) offers 100MB connection in Grant county with a 25GB monthly cap for $37.95 ($39.95 in Douglas County) when bought as a "single" service. »online.localtel.net/09/grant_county.htm
IFiber offers 100MB in Douglas and Grant county for $39.95. According to The Seattle Times, iFiber has been reaching 114MBps. This ISP has no caps. »www.ifiber.tv/sites/web/docroot/···ty=grant »seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/t···p_h.html
Amerion also offers 100MB connections with no cap for $39.95. »www.amerion.com/fiber.asp
Out of the three only one of them (LocalTel) states that they offer 100MB connections
Douglas County's fiber portal: »www.dccn.net/
Grant County: »www.gcpud.org/customerService/se···iber.htm
Chelan County: »fiber.chelanpud.org/euedu/
Article from Cisco on Grant County PUD's Fiber network. »www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns341···e2d.html
These are mostly local ISPs so you won't find any forums for them. |
|
 | That's wild! This country needs local ISP's EVERYWHERE! They would put the big giants out of business with those prices and speeds! -- »Please check out my friend's band |
|