 IIIBradIIIComm M-E-L Instr join:2000-09-28 Greer, SC Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
| Wow Wow, this is actually big news. I wondered why T-Mobile came out pushing those no-contract plans so hard last month - I guess now we know.
And yes, I'm sure it'll be dual/tri/quad/whatever band and work on multiple carriers. I do wonder if it'll be GSM only though? |
|
 FBGuyyippee ki yayPremium join:2005-03-19 Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T U-Verse
| yea i've been wondering this as well. if it works on CDMA also then sprint and verizon better be ready.
does anyone know if a carrier can say no to having it on their network. i.e. if you got this phone (and it worked on cdma) and you went to VZ could they not allow you to use it on their network? -- sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps |
|
 IIIBradIIIComm M-E-L Instr join:2000-09-28 Greer, SC Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
| said by FBGuy:yea i've been wondering this as well. if it works on CDMA also then sprint and verizon better be ready. does anyone know if a carrier can say no to having it on their network. i.e. if you got this phone (and it worked on cdma) and you went to VZ could they not allow you to use it on their network? I can't imagine them being very successful at it. But then again I can't imagine them wanting to do that either - none of these companies want to turn away paying customers. -- »www.FlightSimWorld.com Remember, there are old pilots and there are bold pilots, but there are no old bold pilots. Flight Simulator |
|
 FBGuyyippee ki yayPremium join:2005-03-19 Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T U-Verse
1 edit | yea. it kind of reminds me of when AT&T didn't allow ppl to use devices other than AT&T devices on the phone network. i'm talking a long time ago. think switchboard operator.
it might actually be illegal now i'm not sure. -- sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps |
|
|
|
 Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | reply to IIIBradIII
Some say Google will NOT push sale of device »news.yahoo.com/s/zd/20091214/tc_zd/246837
Will Google sell an updated developer device that may be called the "Nexus One?" Sure, I can see that, but it wouldn't be a massive consumer play, and it wouldn't "disrupt" the wireless industry.
The nearly hysterical frothing about the "Google Phone" overlooks a whole bunch of existing facts. The T-Mobile G1, after all, was a phone whose software was dictated by Google; it was a "Google Phone." Google has already sold two phones online, unlocked, to developers - the Android Dev Phone 1 (a G1 clone) and the Google Ion (also known as the T-Mobile MyTouch 3G.)
The idea that gets everyone hot under the collar is that Google may sell a phone directly, magically compatible with all U.S. carriers, but somehow without the restrictions and bindings that U.S. carriers place on devices.
What this desire really comes from, of course, is Americans' desperate wish (and it is all about Americans; the rest of the world doesn't have this problem) to see the iPhone on a carrier other than AT&T.
Remember, unlocked smartphones have been available here for years. Nokia has been trying to push them on people for ages. Some of Nokia's phones, such as the N95 and E71, have been excellent. Almost nobody buys them, because they're seen as too expensive without the carrier subsidy.
So as I said Saturday, what's most likely here is that we have a new HTC Android phone which is the flagship for the newest version of Google's Android software, much the way the T-Mobile G1 and Motorola Droid have been. It might also be the flagship phone for the new unsubsidized T-Mobile plans.
It's clear that American consumers want some sort of messiah to save them from the structure of our wireless industry. But it's not going to be Apple, and it's probably not going to be Google, either. If you feel that strongly that you need to be freed from the carrier-controlled system, write to your Congressional representative - that's the only way things will change any time soon. So, short version, this will get limited distribution and WILL NOT be the unsubsidized blockbuster some hope it will be. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
|
|
 AVonGaussPremium join:2007-11-01 Boynton Beach, FL | I guess this is one possibility, but I wouldn't bet on it... |
|
 iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to FBGuy
Re: Wow It's GSM so that's a moot point. Pretty sure Verizon would be fine with the device on their network, and Sprint loves teh Android so they'd probably like it too.
Wonder if a CDMA version will come out anyway for these two providers, since they have combined about 130 million customers. |
|
 Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | said by iansltx:It's GSM so that's a moot point. Pretty sure Verizon would be fine with the device on their network, and Sprint loves teh Android so they'd probably like it too. Wonder if a CDMA version will come out anyway for these two providers, since they have combined about 130 million customers. »mediamemo.allthingsd.com/2009121···D_iphone
But, sources say Googles decision to use GSM came only because Verizon Wireless (VZ), which uses the rival CDMA technology, has so far declined to help the company push the new phone. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
|
|