 r81984Fair and BalancedPremium
join:2001-11-14
Katy, TX
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·AT&T DSL Service
 ·row44
| There's plenty of legitimate reasons.... said by :
There's plenty of legitimate reasons to oppose network neutrality protections without having to completely make them up.
No there is not. There are no legitimate reasons to oppose net neutrality.
--
Republicans: less fiscally conservative than that other party. |
|
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
| "oppose network neutrality protections," not oppose network neutrality.
There are valid reasons to oppose network neutrality laws, including the worry that government might be too incompetent to create useful ones, or the fear that government is so corrupt, that industry lobbyists will shape the laws into something that actually winds up making things worse. |
|
r81984Fair and BalancedPremium
join:2001-11-14
Katy, TX Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T DSL Service
·row44
| said by Karl Bode:including the worry that government might be too incompetent to create useful ones, or the fear that government is so corrupt, that industry lobbyists will shape the laws into something that actually winds up making things worse. In those cases it would not be network neutrality, but a law that restricts the internet.
--
Republicans: less fiscally conservative than that other party. |
|
| You've successfully lost me... |
|
r81984Fair and BalancedPremium
join:2001-11-14
Katy, TX | Net Neutrality = unrestricted internet |
|
chimera
join:2009-06-09
Washington, DC Reviews:
 ·Comcast
| Except we still need to allow for reasonable bandwidth management including QoS settings. Which is why it's important to make sure that the right laws pass and not something that either does nothing or is so draconian that it restricts further innovation by blocking out potentially fair QoS technologies. |
|
