<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Muni wireless can help 3G Congestion&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Muni-wireless-can-help-3G-Congestion-23504395</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:31:10 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:31:10 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Muni wireless can help 3G Congestion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Muni-wireless-can-help-3G-Congestion-23504962</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : It would also obviate the need for an aircard around time. So I would see why they wouldn't encourage it unless the hotspots are AT&T or Verizon branded.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Muni-wireless-can-help-3G-Congestion-23504962</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:26:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Muni wireless can help 3G Congestion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Muni-wireless-can-help-3G-Congestion-23504395</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bill Dollar posted : Verizon, and especially AT&T should be encouraging projects that offer basic, free 1Mbps citywide wifi.  It can help them offload some of the supposed data strain on their 3G networks.  It would complement their services, and increase their value.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Muni-wireless-can-help-3G-Congestion-23504395</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:56:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
