said by openbox9: said by karlmarx:
as LONG AS YOU DON'T NEED TO MAKE A PROFIT.
Therein lies the problem with socialism. Somebody, somewhere has to pay for it. Who pays the bill if Philly doesn't make a profit, or at least break even?
Private industry doesn't seem to providing broadband fast enough for most of us, yet you reject another way? At least in this version of socialism, there is a potential benefit for all. Or would you rather have capitalism like Wall Street practices it, where we privatize profits and socialize the risk?