site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
577
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

sameshtdd

join:2006-01-04
Teaneck, NJ

IPTV reason to upgrade?

Wouldn't these speeds have to be shared with your TV service also since FiOS wants to go to an all IPTV system?


gatorkram
KaBOOM Baby
Premium
join:2002-07-22
Winterville, NC
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Suddenlink

said by sameshtdd:

Wouldn't these speeds have to be shared with your TV service also since FiOS wants to go to an all IPTV system?
I guess so....

but man..

How many different channels could you watch at once..

And don't even get me started about how much you could tivo/dvr...
--
Give me bandwidth or give me death!
»/testhistory/661871/4f240

sameshtdd

join:2006-01-04
Teaneck, NJ

4 HDDVRS all recording 2 HD streams at the same time. That's 8 streams. 8x19Mbps=160Mbpsx64users=5.12Gbps

Seems like something they need to be prepared for.


twill1989

join:2009-01-03
Goose Creek, SC

reply to gatorkram
I dont think a change to IPTV would make a difference. Theoretically, IPTV would take up less space since only one stream would be sent at a time. Just look at Uverse vs. basic cable. Instead of sending a standard broadcast signal, Uverse uses IPTV, which uses roughly 7mbps. Im not sure exactly how much space a broadcast stream takes up, but one could imagine if it were less than IPTV, Uverse would utilize it.


majortom1029

join:2006-10-19
Lindenhurst, NY
kudos:1

reply to sameshtdd
i am pretty sure tv is on a different wavelength then internet right?


Friday, 01-Jun 20:13:59 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics