| reply to FBGuy
Re: I simply wonder Tobacco Industry (20th century): "There is no substantial proof that cigarettes cause cancer."
Cell Phone Industry (early 21st century): "There is no substantial proof that cell phones cause cancer."
Any questions?
And of course, most users of the aforementioned products want to believe the industry shills, because they are addicted to the products in question (although in different ways - the first is a physical addiction, the second is more psychological). |
|
 tschmidtPremium,MVM
join:2000-11-12
Milford, NH
kudos:5
 ·Fairpoint Commun..
 ·Hollis Hosting
| said by cell avoider :
Tobacco Industry (20th century): "There is no substantial proof that cigarettes cause cancer."
Cell Phone Industry (early 21st century): "There is no substantial proof that cell phones cause cancer."
Any questions? You forget even though the industry stonewalled to the bitter end there was compelling scientific evidence that tobacco was linked to cancer. As far as I know there is no scientific evidence of a cancer like to cell phone use.
/tom |
|
Reviews:
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| said by tschmidt:said by cell avoider :
Tobacco Industry (20th century): "There is no substantial proof that cigarettes cause cancer."
Cell Phone Industry (early 21st century): "There is no substantial proof that cell phones cause cancer."
Any questions? You forget even though the industry stonewalled to the bitter end there was compelling scientific evidence that tobacco was linked to cancer. As far as I know there is no scientific evidence of a cancer like to cell phone use. /tom Well to be fair, this is different since cell phones are relatively new, and have not been studied with rigor.
Also, I would stay on the side of caution knowing that humans have differing abilities to absorb radiation. |
|
 don1p2
join:2004-06-11
Boston, MA | reply to cell avoider
said by cell avoider :
Tobacco Industry (20th century): "There is no substantial proof that cigarettes cause cancer."
Cell Phone Industry (early 21st century): "There is no substantial proof that cell phones cause cancer."
Any questions?
And of course, most users of the aforementioned products want to believe the industry shills, because they are addicted to the products in question (although in different ways - the first is a physical addiction, the second is more psychological).
You forgot Big Federal Government (yeah the industry) (Obama edition): they excuse obscene gov't spending and deficit spending all designed to radically change the free-enterprise system that our forefathers envisioned.
The day is coming....we tithe our paycheck to th goverment and get a small stipend to live with. |
|
 FBGuyyippee ki yayPremium
join:2005-03-19
·Comcast
 ·T-Mobile US
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to DataRiker
said by DataRiker 
Also, I would stay on the side of caution knowing that humans have differing abilities to absorb radiation.
[/BQUOTE :humans have differing abilities to absorb information as well  --
sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps |
|
FBGuyyippee ki yayPremium
join:2005-03-19 | reply to don1p2
i think your off topic don1p2 |
|
