1 edit | Brodsky long time hate of Connected Nation colors opinion Let's face it. Depending on Brodsky to give an impartial opinion of Connected Nation is like looking for Glenn Beck to give an impartial opinion on Obama. There is way too much bad blood there to give his opinion any real weight.
Brodsky may get some facts right; some of the time; but he starts from a position that CN can do no right.
Here is a sampling on how often Public Knowledge has commented on Connected Nation:
»www.google.com/search?q=%22conne···=0&tbo=1 |
|
|
|
| said by fAcEtIOUs:Let's face it. Depending on Brodsky to give an impartial opinion of Connected Nation is like looking for Glenn Beck to give an impartial opinion on Obama. There is way too much bad blood there to give his opinion any real weight. Brodsky may get some facts right; some of the time; but he starts from a position that CN can do no right. Here is a sampling on how often Public Knowledge has commented on Connected Nation: » www.google.com/search?q=%22conne···=0&tbo=1 Thanks for pointing out the source. While I don't have an opinion of Brodsky, it is good to recognize an advocate. |
|
| Brodsky is an "advocate" for one thing: Google, which contributes to his organization and pays a healthy chunk of his salary. Google (itself a large, fundamentally evil monopolist) doesn't like Connected Nation, because it paints an accurate picture of broadband coverage rather than finding fault with ISPs (which Google has designated as its enemies). So, Brodsky has taken up the battle on Google's behalf. |
|
WhatNowPremium
join:2009-05-06
Charlotte, NC | I figure Google could make a map of broadband by just reading search request headers and streams for a month. |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
 ·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to SuperWISP
Google does donate money to his organization. That doesn't mean it owns him. He was around before Google, after all.
Personally, It's very good to see an advocate on the Consumer side of the equation, for once.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
|
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
Re: Brodsky long time hate of Connected Nation colors opinion said by fAcEtIOUs:Let's face it. Depending on Brodsky to give an impartial opinion of Connected Nation is like looking for Glenn Beck to give an impartial opinion on Obama. There is way too much bad blood there to give his opinion any real weight. Brodsky may get some facts right; some of the time; but he starts from a position that CN can do no right. Here is a sampling on how often Public Knowledge has commented on Connected Nation: » www.google.com/search?q=%22conne···=0&tbo=1 I`ve read many of his comments and analyses. He is quite impartial. Connected Nation is the essence of corruption tied to our government. The fact that it continues to thrive even to this day speaks volumes about the problems in our government. |
|
| reply to SuperWISP
Questions Brett. How much is a "chunk"? 55 percent? 90 percent? What is Brodsky's salary, and how much of it is paid by Google versus other funders listed in their annual report, like the Ford Foundation? And why is it that Brodsky was writing on this issue and other issues before Google began to fund him?
We all of course are suspicious of corporate influence (the theme of this thread), but your obsession with Google is really hysterical. I mean, "designated (ISPs) as enemies"? Google, the same company that is walking hand-in-hand with Verizon right now? |
|
