site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
205
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


NOYB
St. John 3.16
Premium
join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR
kudos:1

1 edit

Way Over Due

I say let them sell both the current overwhelming packages and a la carte, and let the customers decide which is right for them. If they want only a hand-full of channels or an overwhelming package deal with more than they can watch/utilize.

--
Be a Good Netizen - Read, Know & Complain About Overly Restrictive Tyrannical ISP ToS & AUP »comcast.net/terms/ »verizon.net/policies/
Say Thanks with a Tool Points Donation


IsItDoneYet
It's ok, I'm NCR

join:2009-07-11
Thunder Bay, ON

I would have used the word underwhelming...

Lets go a la carte! $5 a channel even and my bill will be cut by 60%!
--
Is this Peak Civilization?



anonymiss

@comcast.net

Um, sorry. Do you like ESPN? Or TNT? Or USA? Or FX? Those would end up costing you $15 each, not $5. Cable companies already almost pay $5 a month PER subscriber right now for ESPN. If ESPN lost 2/3rds of the people paying for it, guess what? Prices would tripple.

said by IsItDoneYet:

I would have used the word underwhelming...

Lets go a la carte! $5 a channel even and my bill will be cut by 60%!

Saturday, 02-Jun 21:54:45 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics