 Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 | MS Security Essentials Should ship with and on by default on all Windows consumer desktops (just giving advanced users the ability to disable like UAC). It would go miles toward defeating botnets and other baddies. |
|
 KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | would hopefully save internet tech support time too for real ISP problems and not CPE software problems. soon as a customer gets a virus they dont call the OEM or or goto the yellow pages for a computer repair shop.
they call their cable or dsl/fiber provider because well it came from the internet so clearly the ISP is at fault. and yes i have gotten that call many times, they think the virus came from the cable modem, and not their kid clicking yes to every popup from facebook ads. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|
|
|
 Reviews:
·Cybersurf Intern..
| reply to Z80A The issue with these things you would think would be good idea; would actually be very bad for microsoft.
With an antivirus added only. The performance baseline of windows would be worse off. The same thing can be said for practically anything else you might consider adding.
Windows guys there have gone to great lengths to implement a system that masks their poor performance. MS aero theme there which glides windows in and out slowly. Gives the application the added 2 seconds worth to catch up. Nicely this effect has a masking effect on other things which by nature are delayed. Like the internet. To get to your homepage. You need to make that dns query which can take half a second itself.
Furthermore. What do you think will be the effect of the antivirus market when they start bundling theirs with windows by default? I have a feeling a large degree of lost revenues for the mcafees and nortons. Who then use their established capital to start their netscape/mozilla style anti-trust lawsuit headed by the us gov or EU.
Hey a norton going completely open source would be awesome though truly 
PS, UAC can be disabled. |
|
 iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to Z80A The problem is that if they did that the security companies would sue Microsoft to pieces due to "antitrust issues" despite the fact that MS is just fixing what's broken with their product, at least in effect.
The big AV companies are scared stiff of MS's entry into the home security market since MS could easily edge out Norton and McAFee just by including their software as standard on new installs of Windows 7, OEM or not. Great for harried tech support reps, horrible for the AV industry. Despite the fact that AV providers have branched out into security suites anyway (they make more money and aren't offered for free by anyone really).
I still prefer AVG over MSSE, though this preference was only renewed after I tested out 9.0, which is to previous versions as Norton 2010 is to previous versions of that suite. |
|
 Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 | reply to munky99999 Security issues are far worse for Microsoft's reputation than any performance hit. |
|
 trparkyApple... YUMPremium,MVM join:2000-05-24 Cleveland, OH kudos:1 Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·Time Warner VOIP
·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to Z80A I agree with giving MSSE with every computer and giving advanced users the ability to remove it. What I don't agree with is disabling UAC.
I'm an advanced user, I know what I am doing. I know my computer inside and outside. I know the purpose of every single process that is running on my computer and the purpose of every single startup entry as well. But do I disable UAC? Nope. Because every single network Administrator and Linux user would tell you is to not run as ROOT and disabling UAC is doing just that. -- Tom Darkscribes, Home of Anime and SciFi Fanfiction and Original works of Fiction. |
|
 Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 | You still have to be able to disable it as some software is not compatible (like my R6V2 on Steam...won't start with UAC enabled). |
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12 | reply to Z80A said by Z80A:Should ship with and on by default on all Windows consumer desktops (just giving advanced users the ability to disable like UAC). It would go miles toward defeating botnets and other baddies. I agree. I doubt they could, as their competitors would scream to the Justice Department about anti-competitive behavior.
Regardless, I had a few issues with it which for now caused me to revert to the corporate Forefront client. I hope they resolve the issues as the progress, as I think it's a great idea. -- trafficcloak.com - pptp/sstp vpn services |
|
 trparkyApple... YUMPremium,MVM join:2000-05-24 Cleveland, OH kudos:1 Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·Time Warner VOIP
·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to Z80A said by Z80A:like my R6V2 on Steam...won't start with UAC enabled They have had more than enough time to patch that game to work with UAC.
And besides, have you tried running it in Administrator mode with compatibility modes set? You can do this by going into the shortcut properties. -- Tom Darkscribes, Home of Anime and SciFi Fanfiction and Original works of Fiction. |
|
 Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 | Doesn't matter how much time they have had...it's Windows software, you can't expect it to just work like it is supposed to.
And yes, I've tried everything...UAC is the problem and turning it off is the fix. |
|
 2 edits | reply to trparky I don't agree with disabling UAC is the same as running a root or as an administrator.
Just because UAC provides an extra step to do something doesn't mean it's not a root or an administrator account. This is because it will still allow the action to be done. A non-root or non-administrative account will have restrictions on it based on security settings set by the administrator and can only be changed by the administrator. UAC will provide a choice regardless of account. A non-root or non-administrative account won't give the choice at all. -- The true patriot is motivated by a sense of responsibility, and out of self interest for himself, his family, and the future of his country to resist government abuse of power. He rejects the notion that patriotism means obedience to the state. |
|
 trparkyApple... YUMPremium,MVM join:2000-05-24 Cleveland, OH kudos:1 Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·Time Warner VOIP
·AT&T U-Verse
| Yes, I know that having UAC enabled doesn't mean that you're not running as root, it just means that if you don't respond to the UAC prompt or you say no, the action will not take place. If the action doesn't take place then you're fine.
But if you have UAC disabled whatever action just ran roughshod over your computer and you were none the wiser. -- Tom Darkscribes, Home of Anime and SciFi Fanfiction and Original works of Fiction. |
|