republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
470
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

chronoss2009
Premium
join:2008-09-23
kudos:2

End bribery and lobbying by large corporations

if the company has more then 100 employees the max you can ever contribute to one person in a life time would be say a maximum of 100$
99 or less the max woudl be 1000 over a life time


NOVA_Guy
ObamaCare Kills Americans
Premium
join:2002-03-05

Why not simply disallow special interest groups, companies, corporations, lobbying groups, think tanks, nonprofits, and anything else that isn't an individual like you and I from contributing even one red cent to our elected and appointed officials?

Then set the maximum amount of money that any individual can give to an elected official very low, essentially what your limits are. This creates a situation that allows significantly more people (middle class folks) to contribute the same amount that affluent folks can, which somewhat levels the playing field when it comes to representation.

When it comes to our elected officials, things should be kept simple. Low limits on campaign contributions, and no "gifts", junkets, meals, or anything of value to be provided to them after their election. Remove the money, and you remove the greed. Remove the greed, and we'll finally start electing folks into office who represent us and our wishes-- not some crazy ideas and schemes of those who think the middle class should pay for those who are too lazy to work.
--
To all liberals: I am NOT one of your parents, so get the heck out of my wallet. It's time for you to grow up and take some personal responsibility for taking care of yourselves, which means not relying on the government to give it all to you.


severach

join:2002-09-12
Jackson, MI

No matter what the rules are "special interest groups, companies, corporations, lobbying groups, think tanks, nonprofits, and anything else" will show up to figure out how to break them. There is no way to win. There are only degrees of losing.


Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4

reply to chronoss2009

said by chronoss2009:

if the company has more then 100 employees the max you can ever contribute to one person in a life time would be say a maximum of 100$
99 or less the max woudl be 1000 over a life time
And NOTHING would change. Because those who own the corporations will still control things and those wanting payoffs will find another way to get it.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

reply to NOVA_Guy
To further that.. why don't we take ALL funds as you outlined and put them into a US GOVERNMENT FUND that all government agencies/parties have the same access to.

No giving to X senator's campaign or party. Just a simple donation to the us government to help make it a better institution to represent it's people. Then any person of any party (or no affiliation at all) that can obtain X signatures to be put on a ballet can also gain access to the same amount of funds (personal contributions must go to general fund) as any other candidate. Then maybe the have nots can actually get representation by people other than the haves. (I use the word representation very loosely there.)


Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4

said by Skippy25:

To further that.. why don't we take ALL funds as you outlined and put them into a US GOVERNMENT FUND that all government agencies/parties have the same access to.
That idea already exists. Ever see that checkoff on your income tax form every year where you can designate $1 for elections. It doesn't work because the constitution(affirmed by SC) allows candidates to spend their own money to get elected. If you then prohibit everyone else from getting contributions, only the very rich can win elections.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

Maybe you misread my statement.

My proposal helps prevent the rich from being the only ones elected.

I am not saying it is legal or not. If the constitution says it is legal now, then the constitution can be amended or laws enacted to say it can't be, along with placing term limits on representatives of both the house and senate to eliminate these life long bed buddies of the corporations. The single biggest issue is that you have those in control having to vote to reduce their control. Which we all know will never happen. Therefore I believe a previous poster hit the nail on the head when it said it is going to take an up raising to fix it.

We have tore apart the underlying meaning of this country and the founding fathers idea of the nation and government by "adapting". Now the structure of the government needs to be adapted to account for the sheer greed, power hungry, corruption, and corporate control.


sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1

1 edit

reply to Romney2012

Re: End bribery and lobbying by large corporations

said by Romney2012:

said by chronoss2009:

if the company has more then 100 employees the max you can ever contribute to one person in a life time would be say a maximum of 100$
99 or less the max woudl be 1000 over a life time
And NOTHING would change. Because those who own the corporations will still control things and those wanting payoffs will find another way to get it.
Wait wait, I can do this too!

Then EVERYTHING would change. Because those who own the corporations won`t be able to control politicians and those wanting payoffs won`t be able to get it.

Sunday, 03-Jun 08:52:40 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics