site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Hijack This logs? ·Panda Free Tools ·Vundo Removal
AuthorAll Replies


Smokey Bear
veritas odium parit
Premium
join:2008-03-15
Annie's Pub
kudos:4

reply to Smokey Bear

Re: [CONFIRMED] Microsoft IIS 0-Day Vulnerability Parsing Files

Results of Investigation into Holiday IIS Claim
Posted Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:42 AM by MSRC TEAM

We’ve completed our investigation into the claims that came up over the holiday of a possible vulnerability in IIS and found that there is no vulnerability in IIS.

What we have seen is that there is an inconsistency in IIS 6 only in how it handles semicolons in URLs. It’s this inconsistency that the claims have focused on, saying this enables an attacker to bypass content filtering software to upload and execute code on an IIS server.

The key in this is the last point: for the scenario to work, the IIS server must already be configured to allow both “write” and “execute” privileges on the same directory. This is not the default configuration for IIS and is contrary to all of our published best practices. Quite simply, an IIS server configured in this manner is inherently vulnerable to attack.

However, customers who are using IIS 6.0 in the default configuration or following our recommended best practices don’t need to worry about this issue. If, however, you are running IIS in a configuration that allows both “write” and “execute” privileges on the same directory like this scenario requires, you should review our best practices and make changes to better secure your system from the threats that configuration can enable. Once again, here’s a list of best practices resources:

· IIS 6.0 Security Best Practices

· Securing Sites with Web Site Permissions

· IIS 6.0 Operations Guide

· Improving Web Application Security: Threats and Countermeasures

The IIS folks are evaluating a change to bring the behavior of IIS 6.0 in line with the other versions. In the meantime, they’ve put more information up about this on their weblog.

I hope this helps answer any questions.

Christopher

*This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights*
»blogs.technet.com/msrc/archive/2···aim.aspx
--
Smokey's Security Forums »www.smokey-services.eu/forums/
Smokey's Security Weblog »smokeys.wordpress.com/
*OTL (formerly OTListIt2) by OldTimer - A sophisticated, comprehensive log analysis tool to clean PCs with malicious content*


Steve
I know your IP address
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA
kudos:5

said by Microsoft :

The key in this is the last point: for the scenario to work, the IIS server must already be configured to allow both “write” and “execute” privileges on the same directory. This is not the default configuration for IIS and is contrary to all of our published best practices. Quite simply, an IIS server configured in this manner is inherently vulnerable to attack.
Put another way: If an IIS web server allows you to upload and execute scripts on that server, you don't need to fool with semicolons or extensions - you can just upload and execute stuff directly.

Right?

Saturday, 02-Jun 03:55:51 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics