| reply to Youngjm
Re: How is this legal? said by Youngjm:I don't like how they are doing it, but corporations do not pay taxes, the customers do. Had the taxes been calculated correctly, the price would have been higher sooner for the services. Actually Missouri customers paid less in taxes than they should have. The deal lets them pay less later(an interest free loan) instead of more earlier. The customers now must pay the state what is due.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
|
|
 TsumePremium
join:2004-02-23
Johnson City, TN
 ·Comcast
| said by fAcEtIOUs:said by Youngjm:I don't like how they are doing it, but corporations do not pay taxes, the customers do. Had the taxes been calculated correctly, the price would have been higher sooner for the services. Actually Missouri customers paid less in taxes than they should have. The deal lets them pay less later(an interest free loan) instead of more earlier. The customers now must pay the state what is due. I was made to understand that all of those "fees" and "taxes" on the phone bill were not actually taxes because the phone company is the one that owes them, not the customer. Am I mistaken? |
|
rradina
join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO | reply to fAcEtIOUs
That assumes the $65M settlement doesn't include penalties and ATT isn't passing them on to the customers. |
|
|
|
