Reviews:
 ·magicjack.com
| reply to iansltx
Re: Not good... said by iansltx:What's simpler than bringing your cell phone into the house and getting unlimited minutes through MJ? I meant simpler to design and bring to market.
I question whether this is simple from a usage standpoint too. It's hard to believe a private company can broadcast on privately-owned frequencies. Or, that they can do it at a power level that will overcome nearby towers, but at the same time not interfere with neighbors who use a service whose tower is distant.
It seems like a lot of potential headache to accomplish what most people would be happy with: a router-based ATA device.
We heard that was coming almost 2 years ago. Almost a year ago we heard the Femtocell was coming (no mention of the ATA device).
And, all during that time MJ hasn't done anything to add features to the existing service. No improvements to the softphone -- except adding two radio buttons to the title bar, causing people to accidentally choose the button which they warn people not to use(!).
It doesn't add up for me. I'll be happy if MJ comes out with something. But, when they can't even add a single new feature to the softphone without bungling it, I'm skeptical they can produce something as complicated as a femtocell.
(Disclaimer: MJ's a great bargain even with shortcomings which make me skeptical about this news.).
Mark |
