site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

bicker

join:2007-05-10
Burlington, MA

1 edit

reply to bionicRod

Re: High Quality versus Low Quality

said by bionicRod:

Alright, it's obvious to everyone that you're a vzw shill
Gosh, how wrong can you be? I've been accused, just in the past year, of being a "shill" for Comcast, DirecTV, Cablevision, Disney, American Airlines, General Electric, Motorola, and about a dozen other companies.

The reality is that I'm a capitalist.

Pleased to meet you.

I have no connection with any of the companies that I comment on, except perhaps as a past or present customer, and/or past or present investor. I would NEVER EVER comment on a company that I worked for.

Never.

You owe me an apology.

said by bionicRod:

If you, as a consumer, sign a legally binding contract with any company specifying a level of service for a set price, and you pay that price, said company should be required to provide the level of service stipulated in that contract.
Absolutely true, specifically as you wrote it, i.e., as "stipulated in that contract". You clearly missed what I said to you in the previous message: "They only 'have to work' as specified by the QoS standards, not your personal standards."

Saturday, 02-Jun 15:45:10 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics