site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
181
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


anon izmuth

@charter.com

phantom fee

perhaps the fee is legitimate for the data usage, but its not the customer who is intentionally using it. Government sources have been forced to admit using phones remotely for covert reasons
»news.cnet.com/FBI-taps-cell-phon···191.html

If Verizon and the FCC keep avoiding comment it may be because the were told not to say anything. With the expanded capabilities and processing power of new generation phones can we be fully aware of what processes are running and what data the phone is sending and receiving without our knowledge?


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

said by anon izmuth :

perhaps the fee is legitimate for the data usage, but its not the customer who is intentionally using it. Government sources have been forced to admit using phones remotely for covert reasons
»news.cnet.com/FBI-taps-cell-phon···191.html

If Verizon and the FCC keep avoiding comment it may be because the were told not to say anything. With the expanded capabilities and processing power of new generation phones can we be fully aware of what processes are running and what data the phone is sending and receiving without our knowledge?
I'm not sure about covert gov't action. Very unlikely. But I wouldn't disagree with the contention that criminal organizations have a way of cloning a phone so they don't get billed or traced.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


Saturday, 02-Jun 15:52:06 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics