<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Everything MLPPP&#x27; in forum &#x27;TekSavvy&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Everything-MLPPP-23663339</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:53:30 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:53:30 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-27722813</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Martin posted : Yes you can get a Static IP & Subnet on MLPPP connections.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-27722813</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:37:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-27722756</link>
<description><![CDATA[bbud posted : I am interested in getting 2 bonded Teksavvy 10/1 DSL connections for my office of 10 users but was wondering if we can use a block of static IP's on this type of setup?  The reason I ask is that we host exchange and some web services here on our current 6/800kb connection and we are looking to increase the speed as 10/1 is the fastest we can get at our location and bonding looks like a good idea..<br><br>Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-27722756</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:26:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-27105070</link>
<description><![CDATA[CyberCam posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1713475" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1713475');">clarknova</a>:</said><p>I'm glad you got it working.<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1546343" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1546343');">CyberCam</a>:</said><p>Never mind about the vlan question, I was reading up the documentation on the wiki and it included vlans as well as ppp instructions for mlppp. I assumed that the vlan method could also be used.</p></div>If you're referring to this page: &raquo;<A HREF="http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-Link_PPP_(MP/MLPPP)" >doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-&middot;&middot;&middot;P/MLPPP)</A>, I wrote that, so if you find it ambiguous or vague I would appreciate your feedback on how I could improve it.<br><br>edit: I think I see what you mean. I will reword it to try to make it clearer how vlans can work with mlppp.<br> </p></div>Yes, that's the document that I was referring to, it did confuse me, because I thought vlans could only be used by static connections & vpn's only.<br><br>It's a lot clearer now thanks for updating it!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-27105070</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:27:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-27102834</link>
<description><![CDATA[clarknova posted : I'm glad you got it working.<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1546343" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1546343');">CyberCam</a>:</said><p>Never mind about the vlan question, I was reading up the documentation on the wiki and it included vlans as well as ppp instructions for mlppp. I assumed that the vlan method could also be used.</p></div>If you're referring to this page: &raquo;<A HREF="http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-Link_PPP_(MP/MLPPP)" >doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-&middot;&middot;&middot;P/MLPPP)</A>, I wrote that, so if you find it ambiguous or vague I would appreciate your feedback on how I could improve it.<br><br>edit: I think I see what you mean. I will reword it to try to make it clearer how vlans can work with mlppp.<br><small>--<br>db</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-27102834</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:14:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-27102774</link>
<description><![CDATA[CyberCam posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1713475" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1713475');">clarknova</a>:</said><p>I'm using pfsense 2.0.1 (and 2.0 and the betas previously) with 7 lines MLPPP. It's also an OpenVPN client but not much traffic goes over the tunnel.<br><br>The only trouble I've had since 2.0 went final is that I have seen one interface completely stop passing traffic (the whole physical interface, including several vlans). The other NIC with its vlans were fine, and I was able to reboot from the console. It's a production system and I wasn't able to find the root of the problem in the limited time I had to investigate before the reboot. Uptime was around 21 days when it happened.<br><br>No UPnP in use here though.<br><br>    <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>how do you set yours up... PPP group or VLANS...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>What do you mean by that? The only way I know to set up mlppp in the pfsense GUI is by going to the PPPs tab, chooseing type PPPoE, then selecting multiple interfaces. Those interfaces can be real or virtual.<br><br> </p></div>The new (actually an old motherboard with AMD Duron onboard processor) hardware did the trick... pfSense is running perfectly now with no errors.<br><br>Never mind about the vlan question, I was reading up the documentation on the wiki and it included vlans as well as ppp instructions for mlppp. I assumed that the vlan method could also be used.<br><br>I must say that I find pfSense the best router software solution for Teksavvy MLPPP... and I've tried them all. It's fast & reliable (when your hardware it working correctly), and is much better than the Linksys WRT* tomato/mlppp and the TP-Link WR1043ND openwrt/mlppp solutions.<br><br><a rel=nofollow HREF="http://www.speedtest.net" > [att=1] </A><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/27102774?c=1743848&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMzY2MzMzOS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="31926 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=135 SRC="/r0/download/1743848~7b22fb83fb42a4b9f7b5dccf36d5302c/7938_439"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-27102774</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:01:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-27053490</link>
<description><![CDATA[infamouskid posted : i too am experiencing my connection to pause on and off. it's a weird download spike that can be seen during any speed test or when downloading. it'll shoot up to max speed then slow down as low as 80kbps then go back up again.<br>i'm running openwrt/mlppp with 2 links on a TP-LINK TL-WR1043ND.<br>tried both round robin and fragmentation transmit modes and yield the same results. but as soon as i turn off mlppp everything is good. <br>oh i'm using 1.0.2-r352 btw.<br><br>what exactly was upgraded last week anyways?<br><small>--<br>BELL CAN SUCKADANUTZ!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-27053490</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:50:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26968052</link>
<description><![CDATA[clarknova posted : I'm using pfsense 2.0.1 (and 2.0 and the betas previously) with 7 lines MLPPP. It's also an OpenVPN client but not much traffic goes over the tunnel.<br><br>The only trouble I've had since 2.0 went final is that I have seen one interface completely stop passing traffic (the whole physical interface, including several vlans). The other NIC with its vlans were fine, and I was able to reboot from the console. It's a production system and I wasn't able to find the root of the problem in the limited time I had to investigate before the reboot. Uptime was around 21 days when it happened.<br><br>No UPnP in use here though.<br><br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>how do you set yours up... PPP group or VLANS...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>What do you mean by that? The only way I know to set up mlppp in the pfsense GUI is by going to the PPPs tab, chooseing type PPPoE, then selecting multiple interfaces. Those interfaces can be real or virtual.<br><br><small>--<br>db</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26968052</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 04:28:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26962161</link>
<description><![CDATA[CyberCam posted : I spoke to a Vyatta rep and he told me that MLPPP is only serial so Vyatta is a no go for Teksavvy, unless you want to mess around the PPPOE config yourself. <br><br>I'm going to give 2.0.1 another try in a few weeks when I upgrade my present server hardware and then use my existing server hardware for the new pfSense box, maybe the extra CPU/RAM (64bit) will have better results. <br><br>For now I'm back to using the old WRT54G running Tomato/MLPPP for just a little over a week... I'll post my results when I set it up.<br><br>Just curious, how do you set yours up... PPP group or VLANS... I was using the PPP group method?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26962161</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 02:34:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26957905</link>
<description><![CDATA[chpalmer posted : I use 2.0.1 with mlppp and openvpn quite heavily at my office with no issues... Not using UPnP however....    Have you tried a 2.1 snapshot based on freebsd 8.3?  Im curious if that might help.<br><br>I was going to give Vyatta a try but have not and probably wont at this point.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26957905</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:55:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26949263</link>
<description><![CDATA[CyberCam posted : Has anyone tried the latest version of Vyatta's (6.3) MLPPP lately? Does it work? I've searched the forum & read some old posts that were back in 2008/09. <br><br>I was using pfSense 2.0.1 but kept having the router crash when using OpenVPN & UPnP with my PS3 so I've had to go back using my old WRT54G router with Tomato!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26949263</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:14:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26922373</link>
<description><![CDATA[toby posted : When using the Tomato MLPPP Version 1.27-mp3alpha7 on a WRT54G router, 2 phone lines, when I disconnect the second phone line, the whole connection goes down.<br><br>The router itself is not accessible until I reconnect the 2nd phone line.<br><br>Is this a known problem with the TomatoMLPPP firmware?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26922373</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 03:14:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26824649</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by PSurge :</said><p>I have been getting intermittent link fragmentation on my 2 line MLPPP connection ever since the upgrade last Friday.  This causes my connection to pause off and on when downloading and can be easily seen when doing a speed test.   I'm currently using the following network settings:<br><br>Bundle MTU 1500<br><br>Link 1 MRU 1486<br>Link 1 MTU 1487<br>Link 1 MRRU 1500<br><br>Link 2 MRU 1486<br>Link 2 MTU 1487<br>Link 2 MRRU 1500<br><br>Tried a few values for MRRU including 1486, 1500 and 1590 and it does not seem to fix the issue.  Any idea if something was changed with the upgrade in regards to MLPPP?<br><br>PSurge<br> </p></div>Issue is now resolved and was related to the DSL slowdown problem discussed in another thread.  A system with 2 or more lines on MLPPP is more sensitive to connectivity issues and will usually result in intermittent connectivity as the split packets can't be reassembled in time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26824649</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:18:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26811408</link>
<description><![CDATA[clarknova posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1820880" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1820880');">joeyxl</a>:</said><p>i am wondering if this will help me,becuase i can only get 640k in my area.<br> </p></div>MLPPP will give you n(x)-o for speed, where n is the number of lines, x is the speed of the slowest of those lines, and o is the small overhead required to do mlppp.<br><br>If you can get 8 modems connected and each of them able to pull down a blazing 640k, then you can realistically expect to get around 5 mbps on the bundle. Make sure you get a router that can handle that kind of speed.<br><small>--<br>db</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26811408</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:11:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26808350</link>
<description><![CDATA[joeyxl posted : i am wondering if this will help me,becuase i can only get 640k in my area.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26808350</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:18:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26801428</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I have been getting intermittent link fragmentation on my 2 line MLPPP connection ever since the upgrade last Friday.  This causes my connection to pause off and on when downloading and can be easily seen when doing a speed test.   I'm currently using the following network settings:<br><br>Bundle MTU 1500<br><br>Link 1 MRU 1486<br>Link 1 MTU 1487<br>Link 1 MRRU 1500<br><br>Link 2 MRU 1486<br>Link 2 MTU 1487<br>Link 2 MRRU 1500<br><br>Tried a few values for MRRU including 1486, 1500 and 1590 and it does not seem to fix the issue.  Any idea if something was changed with the upgrade in regards to MLPPP?<br><br>PSurge]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26801428</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:19:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26775889</link>
<description><![CDATA[ziggy89 posted : We currently are setup on single line MLPPP, and plan on having a dry loop line installed so we can set up up 2-line mlppp<br><br>I'm a little unclear about the physical setup.  I'd really appreciate it if someone could clarify a few things for us.  <br><br>Router is Linksys WRT54GL flashed with TOMATO<br><br>I'm thinking it would be set up this way:<br><div class="bquote"><p><i>Note: Router is Linksys WRT54GL flashed with TOMATO</i><br><br>Line 1 ( Our current DSL connection )  --> Modem 1  --> WAN port on Router<br><br>Line 2 ( Dry loop DSL line ) --> Modem 2  --> a LAN port on the Router<br><br>LAN2  ---> PC1<br>LAN3  ---> PC2<br><br>Then configure Tomato for 2 line MLPPP<br><br></p></div>Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26775889</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:47:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26658009</link>
<description><![CDATA[haggaret posted : My attempt to move from 2 to 3 bonded connections isn't going smoothly unfortunately.I don't see it stating a PPP session on eth3 as expected (see below).<br><br>Here is the output of db_dump:<br><br>root@Bonder-HDP:/opt/mlppp/bin# ./db_dump <br>ppp0_username=xxxxxx@yyyyyyy.com<br>ppp0_defaultroute=1<br>ppp0_multilink=eth0,eth2,eth3<br>ppp0-key=6674C145<br>ppp0-link=11348<br>ppp0_multilink_top=3<br>ppp0_remote_endpoint=local:34.36.30.38.33.32.30.30.32.36.00.00.00.00.00<br>_ppp0-0_lcp_status=1<br>_ppp0-1_lcp_status=1<br><br>Starting the connection:<br><br>root@Bonder-HDP:/opt/mlppp/bin# ./pppoe_start ppp0<br>Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded.<br>Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded.<br>root@Bonder-HDP:/opt/mlppp/bin# Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded.<br>PPP session is 12280<br>Starting negotiation on eth0<br>PPP session is 3538<br>Starting negotiation on eth2<br>PAP authentication succeeded<br>peer from calling number 00:90:1A:A0:A2:7A authorized<br>Using interface ppp0<br>ioctl(PPPIOCSFRAG): Invalid argument (line 775)<br>New bundle ppp0 created<br>Terminating on signal 15<br>Connection terminated.<br>local  IP address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx<br>remote IP address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx<br>primary   DNS address 206.248.154.22<br>secondary DNS address 206.248.154.170<br>Terminating link on signal 2<br>Link terminated.<br>Timeout waiting for PADO packets<br><br>The other weird thing is that if I reboot the system, it all goes to hell. It doesn't start up automatically, and I had to re-copy over the /var/run/mlppp directory to get anything going.<br><br>Anyone have any experience with this that would be willing to help me out? Like I said - 2 seems to work fine, but trying to get to 3 isn't going so well.<br><br>Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26658009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:02:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26654481</link>
<description><![CDATA[Mersault posted : Sad to hear about the Sangoma situation. I've generally liked them, and it's a local company which is awesome. But I've only ever worked with their voice gear.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26654481</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:29:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26650066</link>
<description><![CDATA[haggaret posted : Well I've successfully bonded two DSLs together as of tonight. I still need to pick up a third modem to add the last one into the mix. I still get the messages about the link being terminated, but everything is working so not sure what to make of that.<br><br>So far speed tests aren't great - especially in the downstream direction - not sure what is going on there. Upstream is about as expected, so that's good news.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26650066</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:46:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26640591</link>
<description><![CDATA[haggaret posted : Gave up on the Sangoma cards and am now just going to use 3 old DSL modems, each connected to a NIC on the same machine running Ubuntu 10.04.  Using the MLPPP package, and I'm pretty close to having this set up properly (I think) but I'm just confused at the IP address I'm getting when it starts up - it doesn't match the static IP I'm *supposed* to get.<br><br>Here is what happens when I start mlppp:<br><br>root@Bonder-HDP:/etc/ppp# /opt/mlppp/bin/pppoe_start ppp0<br>root@Bonder-HDP:/etc/ppp# Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded.<br>PPP session is 11272<br>Starting negotiation on eth0<br>PAP authentication succeeded<br>peer from calling number 00:90:1A:A3:B5:F1 authorized<br>Using interface ppp0<br>ioctl(PPPIOCSFRAG): Invalid argument (line 775)<br>New bundle ppp0 created<br>local IP address 206.248.132.238<br>remote IP address 206.248.154.106<br>primary DNS address 206.248.154.22<br>secondary DNS address 206.248.154.170<br>Terminating link on signal 2<br>Link terminated.<br><br>I'll dig into this a bit more (to the best of my ability) but figured I'd post here just in case someone had done this already and knew what was was going on. I'm also confused by the "Link Terminated" message because despite the fact I've got the wrong IP address, the link is definitely up. (I was able to post this afterall)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26640591</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:27:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26606201</link>
<description><![CDATA[haggaret posted : I've heard back from Sangoma - they are basically telling me that there are issues getting more than one card to work simultaneously in Ubuntu, especially on kernels newer than 2.6.30. They've suggested I try CentOS with an older kernel. <br><br>I think I may go the other way and return the cards and just pick up a couple modems if I can find them for a decent price.<br><br>This has certainly been a learning experience so far... Still hoping I manage to get this going eventually.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26606201</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:59:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26603400</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Yes, I have confirmed that each card can connect individually, but when I try to start them both, the system hangs.<br><br>I was trying to use the following guide:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://wiki.sangoma.com/Wanpipe-Multi-Link-PPP" >wiki.sangoma.com/Wanpipe-Multi-Link-PPP</A><br><br>The Sangoma support guys have been pretty awesome - it started out with a driver issue where I couldn't even get one card to work, but they resolved that and now each of the cards works individually, but sadly I can't seem to get more than one to come up without causing the system to hang - never mind actually trying to connect with them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26603400</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:27:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26603054</link>
<description><![CDATA[clarknova posted : Have you tried connecting with each card individually? If each works by itself, how are you trying to bond them? Have you installed the Linux/MLPPP stuff from fixppp.org?<br><small>--<br>db</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26603054</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:18:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26601765</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Has anyone here had any experience with the Sangoma S518 ADSL PCI cards? I picked up 3 of them, thinking I would stick them into a box running Ubuntu and then bond 3 DSL connections together, but so far I haven't been able to get more than one card up at a time.<br><br>I've got Sangoma support looking into it, but figured I'd check here to see if anyone else has managed something similar.<br><br>I should also mentioned that I'm not stuck on using Ubuntu - although I would like to stay away from windows....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26601765</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:48:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26582800</link>
<description><![CDATA[metamaster posted : Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26582800</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:55:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26558016</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Martin posted : Yes you can.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26558016</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:33:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26557956</link>
<description><![CDATA[metamaster posted : Since Bell is not throttling anymore can I get rid of my SLPPP?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26557956</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:23:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26528400</link>
<description><![CDATA[clarknova posted : I have posted a bounty to have the Tomato/MLPPP code updated to work with modern hardware, plus vlan support. I would appreciate it if any interested party here would either contribute funds to the purse or code to the solution.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://tomatousb.org/forum/t-259111/tomato-mlppp#post-1300830" >tomatousb.org/forum/t-259111/tom&middot;&middot;&middot;-1300830</A><br><br>For anybody interested at tackling the code, I've compiled a quick list of handy references to get you started:<br><br>Guspaz and DSLRicer's Tomato/MLPPP:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://fixppp.org/" >fixppp.org/</A><br><br>Guspaz discusses the value-add of their code over standard Linux MLPPP:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r23788729-">Re: Acanac's MLPPP does not support Tomato MLPPP?</A><br><br>Toastman compiles (Tomato with vlans):<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.4shared.com/dir/v1BuINP3/Toastman_Builds.html" >www.4shared.com/dir/v1BuINP3/Toa&middot;&middot;&middot;lds.html</A><br><br>Shibby's builds (Tomato with vlans and vanilla single-link MLPPP):<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://tomato.groov.pl/index.php" >tomato.groov.pl/index.php</A><br><br>OpenWRT/MLPPP (OpenWRT with Guspaz and DSLRicer's MLPPP Mods and<br>support for up to 4 links in GUI. Also supports packet splitting):<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://fw5.net/" >fw5.net/</A><br><br>Original Tomato firmware, against which Guspaz and DSLRicer's mods were developed:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato" >www.polarcloud.com/tomato</A><br><small>--<br>db</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26528400</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:46:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26468052</link>
<description><![CDATA[doofoo posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1714099" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1714099');">FiReSTaRT</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1713475" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1713475');">clarknova</a>:</said><p>If you have a DSL connection that is getting 1.5/0.5, then the best you can hope for by adding another connection is 3/1.<br> </p></div>Technically speaking, you're probably correct if restricted to TSI service. OpenWRT/MLPPP now supports heterogeneous bonding, so 1.5/0.5 + 5/0.8 = 6.5 + 1.3 (all minus the 15% PPPoE overhead), but this feature might require support on the LNS side as well. If TSI gives me 2 different speed profiles, I'll be glad to test it ;)<br> </p></div>How exactly does this work with different speeds?  Are you referring to the MLPPP on the providers side having link speed profiles set for the bonding?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26468052</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:31:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26451457</link>
<description><![CDATA[infamouskid posted : which type of transmit mode should i be using in openwrt/mlppp with teksavvy?<br><br>fragmentation, rr or rr performance?<br><small>--<br>BELL CAN SUCKADANUTZ!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26451457</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:25:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26428056</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fukker posted : Amazing topic, really easy explanation on how to setup MLPPP.<br><br>Thank you very much.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26428056</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:52:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26347138</link>
<description><![CDATA[filipesanta posted : ok so i want to try out settign up a mlppp conection but i jsut want to bypass the bell throttle i dont need a multilink.<br>So what i need is a slppp and so far i have been geting diferent tips on thisregarding what do i need for it.<br><br>i have a speedstream 6300 router conected to dsl.<br><br>aparently this router cant be used so i need to go get a new router or modem but so far i coudnt understand if i need 1 MODEM and 1 ROUTER...just 1 MODEM or if i can use one of those routers that make it work without a modem(im sorry but my knowledge on internet stuff is BAD )<br><br>i can get my hands on a D-link router(or modem..i dont know anymore!!)<br><br>basicaly all i wan tto know it...im using a single piece of gear(this speedstream 6300) that works as mdoem and router(i think..at least has other ports and wireless).<br><br>for a slppp conection just to bypass throttle what do i need to get? jsut the Dlink will do? or shoud i get a modem+the dlink router?<br><br>any modem will do if thats the case?<br><br>ohh and i woud also like to know if anyone experienced some improvements playign world of warcraft or othe ronline gaming after starting to use mlppp // slppp....because my conection..speed etc seems fine..its jsut the packet lose and sudent lag spikes that make everythign basicaly unplayble<br><br>thanks in advance]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26347138</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:59:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26335052</link>
<description><![CDATA[Sith Sideus posted : i am suppose to be getting 5/0.8 already but unfortunately i only get around 1.5/0.5 which sucks, and unless i can figure out why it is so low and fix it i wont bother with MLPPP since it would cost me way to much to get the upload i need...which means in the end ill be stuck.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26335052</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:25:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP -</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26312291</link>
<description><![CDATA[FiReSTaRT posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1806485" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1806485');">veger</a>:</said><p>HI! Thanks for the info, ps, someone told me that Openwrt  does Not support two lines at the moment or Not for the router "WZR-HP-AG300H" ( one of the two ).<br>I see it listed here "http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/start#buffalo" but I would prefer if someone could confirm it before ordering one. </p></div>OpenWRT/MLPPP is a fork and it does work on TSI's MLPPP. I've personally tested it with single line setup before switching to cable and it should easily work on the multiple line setup. For it, you'd need TP Link TL-1043ND or Netgear WNDR3700 though. Those are the only 2 platforms it supports (other than x86, which seems to be a non-starter for you).<br><small>--<br>Never under estimate a Southern gentleman with a backhoe and a shotgun (credit: &raquo;<A HREF="http://blog.level3.com/2011/08/04/the-10-most-bizarre-and-annoying-causes-of-fiber-cuts//" >blog.level3.com/2011/08/04/the-1&middot;&middot;&middot;r-cuts//</A>)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26312291</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:11:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26312280</link>
<description><![CDATA[FiReSTaRT posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1713475" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1713475');">clarknova</a>:</said><p>If you have a DSL connection that is getting 1.5/0.5, then the best you can hope for by adding another connection is 3/1.<br> </p></div>Technically speaking, you're probably correct if restricted to TSI service. OpenWRT/MLPPP now supports heterogeneous bonding, so 1.5/0.5 + 5/0.8 = 6.5 + 1.3 (all minus the 15% PPPoE overhead), but this feature might require support on the LNS side as well. If TSI gives me 2 different speed profiles, I'll be glad to test it ;)<br><small>--<br>Never under estimate a Southern gentleman with a backhoe and a shotgun (credit: &raquo;<A HREF="http://blog.level3.com/2011/08/04/the-10-most-bizarre-and-annoying-causes-of-fiber-cuts//" >blog.level3.com/2011/08/04/the-1&middot;&middot;&middot;r-cuts//</A>)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26312280</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:08:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP -</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26311971</link>
<description><![CDATA[veger posted : HI! Thanks for the info, ps, someone told me that Openwrt  does Not support two lines at the moment or Not for the router "WZR-HP-AG300H" ( one of the two ).<br><br>I see it listed here "http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/start#buffalo" but I would prefer if someone could confirm it before ordering one.<br><br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26311971</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:30:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP -</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26308251</link>
<description><![CDATA[clarknova posted : It is strongly recommended that you wipe the nvram of any device after installing Tomato/mlppp. I think this will take care of any lockup or other unpredictable behaviour.<br><small>--<br>db</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26308251</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:58:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26303282</link>
<description><![CDATA[veger posted : HI! I check out the router recommendation you gave for the Netgear "WNDR3700v2" cpu=680 flash=16 ram=64, and on newegg I read a lot of dropped connections even from a few users that gave the router a good rating. So I check out the list at fw5.net and saw the Buffalo WZR-HP-AG300H cpu=680 flash flash=32 ram=128.<br><br>Although this router has fewer reviews, overall the cons are far less relevant (IMHO). most of the complaints about the Buffalo WZR-HP-AG300H was concerning "non-detachable antennas and difficult interface" non of which concerns me or anyone else whom wants to use another firmware and has no need for detachable antennas. The pros are obvious as its a more powerful router and its a dual band (comparable to the Asus RT-N16 with the exception that the Asus is not a dual band).<br><br>I plan to use it as a main gateway as all other Hotspot routers connect into it, thus the need for a faster CPU and ram. :)<br><br>PS.One of the reasons why I choose the Asus WL-520GU as a Hotspot router was because of its detachable antennas as I need it to connect to an external powered antenna on the top of an apartment building. <br><br>Thank you very much for your replies. :)<br><br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26303282</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:47:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP -</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26303001</link>
<description><![CDATA[veger posted : HI! Thanks for info I will look it up. ps. Something screwed up since my last post concerning version 7. After a few hours the connections was down and I could no longer get into the routers admin area. I had to re-flash the router.<br><br>So I will load v7 again on another Asus WL-520GU but this time I will try to flash it directly without going through the upgrade process. (meaning I will not flash with 4 first then upgrade).<br><br>I will get to this here when I am done.<br><br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26303001</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:57:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26299439</link>
<description><![CDATA[clarknova posted : The WL-520GU can handle 15-20 mbps of throughput, although you might run it out of RAM if you really hammer it with torrents.<br><br>Have a look at &raquo;<A HREF="http://fw5.net/" >fw5.net/</A>. I believe the WNDR3700v2 was recently added to the supported list, and should handle 100 mbps or so of throughput.<br><br>If you really want to go all out you could install pfsense 2.0 on the x86 hardware of your choice. &raquo;<A HREF="http://pfsense.org" >pfsense.org</A> I think Linux/MLPPP might still be a viable option if you're handy with a shell. &raquo;<A HREF="http://fixppp.org" >fixppp.org</A><br><small>--<br>db</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26299439</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:40:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26298397</link>
<description><![CDATA[veger posted : Ps, its me Webcan, somehow I got missed up on sites and must have created another account here BY accident. oppps. <br><br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26298397</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:43:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26298388</link>
<description><![CDATA[veger posted : HI!. thanks for link, so far it works fine with my Asus WL-520GU with Multi-link - Dual lines. With two 5 meg/750k up connects I am getting about on average Dn=9.0 mb Up=1.15. (no longer than usual to connect even when comparing it to a stable dd-wrt version).<br><br>Question: I do need more power though. What is the most powerful router that tomato/mlppp supports? I got a HOTSPOT with about 20 (and growing) users and some of them I know use utorrent and vuse.<br><br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26298388</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:39:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26295649</link>
<description><![CDATA[clarknova posted : The ND version is hidden in a thread in this forum. I believe it's the announcement thread for the latest alpha.<br><br>As for the RT-N16, it uses Linux 2.6, while the Tomato/MLPPP exists only in Linux 2.4. In other words, until somebody does some porting work, 802.11n routers are not candidates for Tomato/MLPPP.<br><br>edit: Here you go: &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r23872311-">Re: Tomato/MLPPP v3 alpha 7 released!</A><br><small>--<br>db</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26295649</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:56:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26290959</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : HI! Does anyone know why the ND version is no longer in the latest build? I have a Asus WL-520-GU and I tried a day ago to load the latest version Alpha 7 and the stable one "Tomato/MLPPP 1.19-mp2 (2.7 MiB)" but did not load on my router after installation.<br><br>from my understanding the ND version is specifically for my routers types and wondering why its not in the Alpha4 release?<br><br>Another thing is what is the word on support for the Asus RT-N16?<br>I am interested in this modem for its power, memory and affordability.<br><br>Paul]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26290959</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:35:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26245768</link>
<description><![CDATA[clarknova posted : If you're referring to the WRT54GL running Tomato/MLPPP, it does.<br><small>--<br>db</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26245768</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:59:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26239128</link>
<description><![CDATA[yalag posted : does anyone know if the router sold by teksavvy for MLPPP supports QoS? If not, how should I incorporate my QoS router into the setup? thank you]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26239128</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:55:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26236138</link>
<description><![CDATA[Sith Sideus posted : ya thats what i thought, thank you.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26236138</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:40:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26236130</link>
<description><![CDATA[clarknova posted : MLPPP has no effect on your DSL connection (ie, what happens between the ISP and the modem). If you have a DSL connection that is getting 1.5/0.5, then the best you can hope for by adding another connection is 3/1.<br><small>--<br>db</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26236130</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:39:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Everything MLPPP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26235923</link>
<description><![CDATA[Sith Sideus posted : so if im only getting 1.5meg down and .5 meg up if i was to set up lets say a 2 connection MLPPP would i be getting 3meg down and 1 meg up? or would it strengthen the line quality and make things better?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Everything-MLPPP-26235923</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:52:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
