<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Bull&#x27;whooooy on average speed !&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bullwhooooy-on-average-speed-23671501</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:07:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:07:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Bull&#x27;whooooy on average speed !</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bullwhooooy-on-average-speed-23676331</link>
<description><![CDATA[TMMerlin posted : Re: Bull'whooooy on average speed !<br><br>KingKuei6<br><br>My Network Connection Point is the first AT&T node my RG connects to [Southfiled, Mi]. My house LAN is 100Base-T and Wifi when I use it is currently clocking at 54Mbps. So, between my laptop and Southfield is pretty much what I planned for.<br><br>I have done progressively distance based speed tests and have seen Ping Times and throughput drop off to nearly 50% less than I see to Southfield.<br><br>I have used AT&T's speed test site and speed test.net.<br>The results are correspondlngly similar.<br><small>--<br>Some people hear their own inner voices with great clearness and they live by what they hear. Such people become crazy but they become legend.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bullwhooooy-on-average-speed-23676331</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:29:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bull&#x27;whooooy on average speed !</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bullwhooooy-on-average-speed-23676223</link>
<description><![CDATA[KingKuei6 posted : Not quite sure what you mean by your "AT&T Network Connection Point". If you mean that you get 5.7Mbps (approx. 730KBps), from your computer to modem, then either your network card is too slow (10Base-T) or the port on the modem/router you're using is slow (10Base-T). But if your speed test is showing 50% less than what you are paying for, then clearly you need to have a chat with AT&T about that, or you need to examine your networking hardware to see if it provides at least 100Base-T on both ends of the connection. Obviously, with people getting sustained speeds of 50mbps+, it's not the overall "Internet infrastructure" but rather the infrastructure to which you connect to the main backbones that is creating a bottleneck. But DSL is horrendous though. Ping times are uninspiring, and PPPoE authentication can be such a pain sometimes when router equipment doesn't play nice with the myriad of modems that are supplied by AT&T, whether SpeedStream, 2Wire, or otherwise.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bullwhooooy-on-average-speed-23676223</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:04:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Bull&#x27;whooooy on average speed !</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Bullwhooooy-on-average-speed-23671501</link>
<description><![CDATA[TMMerlin posted : That fast access line is a CROCK ..!<br><br>Sure ..my UVerse 6Meg access gives me 5.7 Meg to my AT&T network connection point .. then my speed tests beyond that drop off by over 50% !!!!<br><br>I had EarthLink 1.5 Meg DSL for $29.95/mo.<br>Now I have AT&T 6Meg DSL for $35.00/mo.<br><br>It seems the faster the access line, the more you pay and the less you actually get across the Internet for the speed you think your paying for !!<br><br>It's very obvious to me ..that the overall Internet infrastructure really SUCKS and can not keep up with demand !<br><small>--<br>Some people hear their own inner voices with great clearness and they live by what they hear. Such people become crazy but they become legend.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Bullwhooooy-on-average-speed-23671501</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:45:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
