http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-broken-23686834 en Sun, 19 May 2013 14:02:19 EDT Sun, 19 May 2013 14:02:19 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-broken-23697295 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-broken-23697295 Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:52:12 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-broken-23687097
»www.aclu.org/national-security_t···ree-zone]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-broken-23687097 Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:55:07 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-broken-23686895 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-broken-23686895 Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:23:12 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-broken-23686874 said by amungus:

Breaking the laws in order to enforce them is wrong.
But, did they break the law?

18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(a)(ii)(B) was the law of the land. And, it was the basis for so-called "immunity" which covered actions between 9/11 and when FISA was amended by the Patriot Act to better accommodate the President's claimed needs.

Basically, we were in a period where, legally, all the President had to do is say "no warrant is necessary." No proof to anyone that that was true.

Mark]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-broken-23686874 Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:20:05 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/broken-23686834
Ends don't justify means.

Big brother loves you.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/broken-23686834 Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:15:33 EDT