<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Yeah, Yeah ... down with Ma&#x27; Bell anyways!&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Yeah-Yeah-down-with-Ma-Bell-anyways-23687785</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:44:54 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:44:54 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Yeah, Yeah ... down with Ma&#x27; Bell anyways!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Yeah-Yeah-down-with-Ma-Bell-anyways-23687785</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Aside from all the legal mumbo-jumbo...<br>This type of thing is also a violation of at&t's ethical standards of doing buisness!<br>Every manager is required to review and sign a compliance document on this stuff. I say, corporate lawyers should be looking for who told the FBI how to circumvent 'the process' and not only fire them, but press criminal charges!<br><br>This cannot be tolerated! A buisness like at&t is held to a standard... even if it is a standard they wrote up for themselves. Breaking it, is NOT an option!<br><br>I know nothing will come of it, but it's yet another reason to keep my communications off at&t's netbroken (because for it to be a network, it has to work...)<br><br>Death to Ma' Bell!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Yeah-Yeah-down-with-Ma-Bell-anyways-23687785</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:01:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
