1 edit | reply to pnh102
Re: Useless said by pnh102:Why? Every cell carrier clearly discloses the ETF and the terms under which a customer will pay it. For most people the ETF could be $500 and they would never pay one. There are also numerous ways ETFs can be avoided entirely by canceling unsatisfactory service within the grace period, getting a prepaid phone or paying full price for a phone. Simply put, this is not a big problem. Even if you bring your own phone or pay full price for a phone, you pay the same monthly rate as someone who acquires a 2 year loan from a carrier. There is thus a strong disincentive to go month to month on a carrier.
ETFs were meant to cover the cost a carrier would incur for providing a new phone to you on a loan if you left early. However, since the real price of the phone is not disclosed, and the ETF is the same for anyone on a 2 year contract, it has since lost its true meaning. ETFs are now simply anti-consumer tools meant to prevent customers from switching to another carrier, allowing carriers to avoid direct competition.
That's why. |
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD | None of this changes the fact that paying an ETF is strictly the choice of the user. If people do not want to pay an ETF, then they can choose to avoid engaging in the activities that they have agreed would oblige them to paying an ETF.
--
"Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service. |
