site Search:


Home Reviews Tools Forums FAQs Find Service ISP News Maps About  
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads

  
Forums >

Comcast Prepares For IPv6 Customer Trials > 2^128 Addresses Claim is inaccurate/misleading

Search Topic:
 Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

AVonGauss
Premium
join:2007-11-01
Boynton Beach, FL
1 edit

reply to ncherry

Re: 2^128 Addresses Claim is inaccurate/misleading

Agreed, I was trying to following along with what was used in the original post and definitely could have done a better job.
to forum · permalink · 2010-01-28 14:36:05 ·


ncherry
Premium
join:2003-07-13
Monroe Township, NJ

I understand, it was also why I suggested it (so others might follow suite). It took me almost a month to stop saying sub-netmask and get the order of smaller/larger straight. Also I reread RARPSL's post and found it very confusing. I couldn't quite figure out what he was talking about with the IPv4/IPv6 /xx portions of his post. Mixing the terminology makes for a messy conversation. IPv6 is going to be confusing for a while until it become the most used protocol.
--
Neil Cherry
Linux Home Automation
Linux HA Blog
Author: Linux Smart Homes For Dummies

to forum · permalink · 2010-01-28 15:30:20 ·
Forums > Comcast Prepares For IPv6 Customer Trials

Sunday, 03-Jun 04:04:25 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics