republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


koolman2
Premium
join:2002-10-01
Anchorage, AK

reply to CatchingSpy

Re: Crack down

12 Mbps = 1.5 MBps
2 Mbps = 256 kBps

You are probably getting exactly what you are paying for. Service is sold in bits and downloads are described in bytes. Divide bits by 8 and you get bytes.

lqrisquicker

join:2010-01-21
Glens Falls, NY

what are you talking about, i get 7/1 from verizon dsl, and on a s speed test i get 6000 to 6800/600 to 800 which is 6/6 or 6.8/8 If you pay for 12/2 service you should be getting at least 10/1.5 im pretty sure anyone using these forums knows how to use the speed tests, however still i cant believe the service is that slow when advertised so high id like to see those speed tests.



koolman2
Premium
join:2002-10-01
Anchorage, AK

2 edits

Speedtests are also done in bits, whereas normal download programs report in bytes.

For example, my home connection is 12/1 Mbps. That means that I can download at 12 megabits per second, or 1.5 megabyte per second. The fastest I'll see in a browser while downloading a file is 1.5 MBps, which is exactly what I'm paying for.

I really wish the world would standardize on one form of measure: either the bit or the byte.



PapaMidnight

join:2009-01-13
Baltimore, MD

1 edit

said by koolman2:

Speedtests are also done in bits, whereas normal download programs report in bytes.

For example, my home connection is 12/1 Mbps. That means that I can download at 12 megabits per second, or 1.5 megabyte per second. The fastest I'll see in a browser while downloading a file is 1.5 MBps, which is exactly what I'm paying for.

I really wish the world would standardize on one form of measure: either the bit or the byte.
I wish we'd standardize kibibit and kebibyte verses kilobit and kilobyte so I don't feel like I'm being shortchanged everytime I purchase a HDD.


puddleglum

@xmission.com

It will never happen since the advertising misleads you into thinking you get more than you actually do. Just look at how the marketing droids have gotten you to use kebi instead of kilo. Thats not right. Computers have always been based on powers of 2 (thus 1024 instead of 1000). Trying to make things decimal here only leads to deliberate obfuscation.


andre2

join:2005-08-24
Brookline, MA

said by puddleglum :

It will never happen since the advertising misleads you into thinking you get more than you actually do. Just look at how the marketing droids have gotten you to use kebi instead of kilo. Thats not right. Computers have always been based on powers of 2 (thus 1024 instead of 1000). Trying to make things decimal here only leads to deliberate obfuscation.
I think it's just that each sector of the industry has its own traditional measure, and can't change because it would confuse customers. CDs are sold using power-of-two units, but are incorrectly labeled with power-of-ten units, so a "700 MB" CD is actually 700 MiB which is larger. On the other hand, DVDs use power-of-ten units, so a 4.7 GB DVD is exactly that.

I think the solution is that whenever powers-of-two are meant, the extra "i" should be used in writing the size. If everyone did that, the ambiguity would be gone, since a size without the "i" would always mean power-of-ten. Computer people could pronounce the sizes in the old way if they want (for example pronounce MiB as "megabyte") as long as it's written correctly.

BTW not all computer hardware is based on powers-of-two, for example AFAIK there is no good reason to use powers of two for hard drive sizes, or networking speeds.


koolman2
Premium
join:2002-10-01
Anchorage, AK

reply to PapaMidnight
I've gotten around that by telling people that I have a one-trillion byte hard drive.


Sunday, 03-Jun 04:10:03 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics