site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX
kudos:1
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

reply to Noah Vail

Re: Condition'd for Suspicion

I tend to agree with you on the children should be off limits, not that they ever have been, but that is another topic. To follow up on what you said, yes, off limits, but when one of the parents decides to use them for pushing their pet project, then they (the parents/president/first lady) have no room to talk, or b*tch about media coverage of their children, since the parents opened the door.

In short, both sides need to leave the children out of the media.


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

1 edit

said by Austinloop:

I tend to agree with you on the children should be off limits, not that they ever have been, but that is another topic. To follow up on what you said, yes, off limits, but when one of the parents decides to use them for pushing their pet project, then they (the parents/president/first lady) have no room to talk, or b*tch about media coverage of their children, since the parents opened the door.

In short, both sides need to leave the children out of the media.
The problem is that the Politicians want to use their children when it is convenient for them and furthers their careers. But when something negative crops up they scream & whine about how it hurts the children if covered. I agree kids should be hands off, but it never will be as long as the pols continue to use their own kids.

Saturday, 02-Jun 04:39:48 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics