site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
87
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


michieru
Premium
join:2009-07-25
Miami, FL
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·Clearwire Wireless
·AT&T Southeast

...

So somebody is suing a company that provided unlimited calling when nobody else would at a affordable price.

My family has used metropcs for years, and had never hit some kind of cap based on calling, nor have I had to pay any fee to cancel.

To me that is no strings attached, now if the company wants to protect themselves by issuing a contract that I won't do anything by having access to their public network. Then they have every right to do so.

But my services are still unlimited as stated, and I am under no contract for the hardware that I fully paid for up front.

Someone is just trying to pocket in some money from an actually good company which are only trying to protect their assets. Because I guarantee most of you wouldn't care if that contract was there or not, because more than likely it's just a network usage policy.

Sunday, 03-Jun 08:54:24 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics