site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

chimera

join:2009-06-09
Washington, DC

reply to knightmb

Re: Fun with Math

Don't forget that for large ISPs most 1TB drives (which run at 7200 RPM) will be too slow to actually keep up with the data, and since they would need failure protection everything would need a RAID setup adding even more cost per GB.

cornelius785

join:2006-10-26
Worcester, MA

that a moot point. they would never consider a non-raid like solution to begin with. i'm 90% sure that servers only use RAID. they aren't stupid enough to only store it on a couple 1TB hard drives with no backups.

also, don't underestimate the speed of high density drives.


chimera

join:2009-06-09
Washington, DC
Reviews:
·Comcast

I'm not trying to underestimate the speed, but this sort of setup would most likely be stored in a SQL database on an external SAN for large ISPs, and when you are writing THAT many entries the latency difference between 7200RPM and 15000RPM makes a difference. My point is the cost for storage shouldn't be thought of as just being the cost of storing this data on a desktop because all of the extra costs to ensure that it operates safely and smoothly REALLY adds up.


Sunday, 03-Jun 09:01:12 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics