how-to block ads
|
|
Share Topic
 |
 |
|
|
| reply to ArgMeMatey
Re: Ready for the chainsaw-and-brick-wall approach yet? 'Just saying that there's no way a company that's a service provider can be expected to give equal access to its competitors.'
Saying they need to is regulating it.
"The Market" and "Evolution" are grossly misunderstood by many Americans it seems. They don't produce what is "best" in the generalized sense of the word. They sustain themselves and whatever sustains itself "wins". Right now with the current regulation, the market sustains itself best with conservative infrastructure build-outs with high recoup costs. That's why you're not seeing people rolling out fiber to every man, woman, and child. It's a matter of profitability. And despite what some economists thought during the 90s, there's no such thing as a "New Economy".
Saying we'd all have super fast broadband really cheap if we just had the right regulation in place is like saying we'd have free energy if we wished really hard. | |
Reviews:
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·AT&T Midwest
 ·voip.ms
·MyPhoneCompany
| said by bogey780:'Just saying that there's no way a company that's a service provider can be expected to give equal access to its competitors.' Saying they need to is regulating it. ... Saying we'd all have super fast broadband really cheap if we just had the right regulation in place is like saying we'd have free energy if we wished really hard. Fair enough. That much I can agree with. It probably does cost more than most people think, but because it's a nickel here and a dime there, we don't notice.
My point is not that anyone should be regulated out of existence, or that companies shouldn't have profits, but that it's a better system for consumers if we know what we're paying, who we're paying, and why. People who aren't willing to pay don't get to play, however.
--
USNG:
16TDN2870
Find your Lat-Long:
Geocoder | | |
|
|
