Reviews:
 ·magicjack.com
| MJ's changing EULA Part of the problem for MJ (or, anyone who might try to critically assess MJ) is that they frequently change the EULA without notice, nor documenting what changed.
In the past, the EULA said MJ would provide an uninstaller. The company was regularly criticized for providing no uninstall, and that the EULA language could be seen as harming the enforceability of the EULA.
That language disappeared about 2 years ago. Like it never existed. (Today, MJ provides a unintallers at its support web site.).
I don't understand how a contract like this can be even remotely enforceable when it changes so frequently, and customers can't even decipher how it changed.
IMO, with the way MJ changes its EULA, anyone could say "To the best of my memory, MJ's EULA says they can to eat your children." I think that kind of defamation would be MJ's fault for not providing all the revisions of the EULA (or, a change log).
Mark |
