 Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
·FreePhoneLine
| reply to TSI Gabe
Re: IPv6 beta Setup my new wrt54gl with the firmware from here: »Re: IPv6 beta
Now have full on mlppp & ipv6 support on my router, very nice. The free ipv6 news servers work pretty damn well and max out my connection, awesome! |
|
 brad join:2007-09-06 Etobicoke, ON | reply to InvalidError said by InvalidError:said by brad:Rogers has not updated their infrastructure to handle IPv6 yet. All DOC3 CMTS support IPv6 and most of the stuff upstream from there should have acquired IPv6 capabilities some 5+ years ago either via firmware upgrade or replacement. This late into the IPv6 game (the IPv6 migration was supposed to start a whole decade ago), the lack of IPv6 has more to do with being lazy (if it ain't broke, don't fix it - most consumer routers don't support it anyhow) than lack of hardware support from the carrier side of things. Right now, I am downloading two torrents and between the ~200 peers I am connected to, I see only 5-6 IPv6 peers I understand it is about being lazy and not about the hw support overall from Rogers perspective. As you mentioned the DOC3 CMTS support it and the DOC3 management requires IPv6 on the backend so it is their for the most part on Rogers infrastructure but its not exposed on the on the regular transit segments of their network to customers. I hope this changes next year though, the sooner the better.
I see similar numbers for torrent peers although some torrents do have quite a few more IPv6 peers. |
|
 | reply to brad said by brad:Rogers has not updated their infrastructure to handle IPv6 yet. All DOC3 CMTS support IPv6 and most of the stuff upstream from there should have acquired IPv6 capabilities some 5+ years ago either via firmware upgrade or replacement. This late into the IPv6 game (the IPv6 migration was supposed to start a whole decade ago), the lack of IPv6 has more to do with being lazy (if it ain't broke, don't fix it - most consumer routers don't support it anyhow) than lack of hardware support from the carrier side of things.
Right now, I am downloading two torrents and between the ~200 peers I am connected to, I see only 5-6 IPv6 peers  |
|
|
|
 | reply to TSI Jorge Hey guys, is there a new build of tomato-mlppp with ipv6 that I could use? The fixppp.org site doesn't seem to have the latest version there. |
|
 1 edit | reply to TSI Gabe Removed post..posted in the wrong thread.
Jorge |
|
 brad join:2007-09-06 Etobicoke, ON | reply to FiReSTaRT said by FiReSTaRT:Will there be any IPv6 testing on cable connections in the near future? Rogers has not updated their infrastructure to handle IPv6 yet. |
|
 clusty join:2009-05-15 Montreal, QC kudos:1 | reply to TSI Gabe Any eta on some Tomato-ND with ipv6? |
|
 | reply to vitesse Will there be any IPv6 testing on cable connections in the near future? |
|
 vitesse join:2002-12-17 Saint-Jean-Sur-Richelieu, QC | reply to TSI Gabe Thanks.
I now use zeroshell/mlppp and have not configured ipv6 on it. |
|
 | reply to vitesse Your old login still works, so you can switch between them at will.
If you're using Tomato you can just leave your IPv6 address in the router and it won't harm anything. |
|
 vitesse join:2002-12-17 Saint-Jean-Sur-Richelieu, QC Reviews:
·ELECTRONICBOX
·TekSavvy DSL
·Bell Sympatico
·Videotron
·voip.ms
| reply to TSI Gabe As I need a static IP i would like to go back with my IPV4 Login.
Can we simply go on our ipv4 login or Teksavvy need to change something on our config?
Will Teksavvy offer static ipv4 on the ipv6 package one day? -- Connection: Teksavvy 12000/1600 in mlppp Globaltuners.com Remotely controled Radio scanner
|
|
 | reply to smartel Without any understanding of the ISP side of things, I would guess the routes are configured when the PPP link is brought up.
I don't see where the link-local address comes in. A route only needs the prefix and the outgoing interface, and doesn't need the link-local address... |
|
 bogusman join:2010-09-10 Pointe-Calumet, QC | reply to TSI Gabe Is still some place for IPv6? I'm I in the correct forum?
Eric |
|
 Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to TSI Gabe Hey guys,
I was wondering, out of curiosity, how is the routing for the consumers /56 blocks is working on the TekSavvy side?
How is the routing for those blocks configured? The link local address of the consumer router on the PPP link could be anything. Is the route dynamically configured each time the PPPoE session is established?
Thanks |
|
 Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to TSI Gabe Hi,
I saw, somewhere earlier in that thread, someone asking how to get it to work on Mac OS X.
Here is what I had to do:
Before establishing the PPPoE connection:
sudo sysctl -w net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv=1
And once the connection is established:
sudo route add -inet6 default -interface ppp0
That can be automated by adding to /etc/sysctl.conf:
net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv=1
And creating a "/etc/ppp/ip-up" script. Something like that could work:
#!/bin/sh
route add -inet6 default -interface ${IFNAME}
"/etc/ppp/ip-up" need to be executable (chmod +x)
Hope that info will be of some help to someone
-- Simon Comeau Martel simon@comeau.info »comeau.info |
|
 iooi join:2002-07-30 Toronto, ON | reply to jerseyjoe123 said by jerseyjoe123:Also wondering if there were still openings for beta testers. I also would like to know if this is still available
Thanks |
|
 kan join:2009-07-29 Calgary, AB | reply to robbat2 west coast and us in alberta too 
I'm here waiting in calgary for the move to ipv6!! |
|
 robbat2Premium join:2010-02-24 Vancouver, BC | reply to TSI Gabe Any update on west coast IPv6? |
|
 daboomPremium join:2001-12-16 Oshawa, ON | reply to shwatkin Are you able to provide any logs for this setup? I am curious to see if the Dlink supports the ipv6cp setup etc .. etc. I just quickly went to their emulator site and checked some options out I would say bout time of them to include the ipv6 stuff lol. I got a feeling you mixed up a couple settings in that ipv6 setup esp on the wan side. |
|
 brad join:2007-09-06 Etobicoke, ON | reply to TSI Gabe Has there been any consideration for establishing a tunnel broker on TSIs network to allow 6in4 tunnels for the cable users? So that cable users can also take advantage of TSI's native v6 transit.  |
|