site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

1 edit

reply to Anonimuz

Re: Population

said by Anonimuz:

You definitely have to take in consideration how much more land ISPs have to cover here, than in the US. Of course we are going to be behind in penetration. US is 32 per square KM vs 3.4 for Canada.
Population density is low when spread over Canada's entire land mass. But practical population density is MUCH higher because most people live in dense areas along the US border.
»atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/m···tion2001

79.4% of Canadians lived in an urban centre of 10 000 people or more


Warez_Zealot
Rural land of the rising sun

join:2006-04-19
Hamilton, ON

Yeah, the population density excuse is getting old. It's basically a lie concocted by Western ISP's to explain why Japan and other "densely populated" Asian countries have such good internet infrastructures.

I live in the second least populated Prefecture in Japan, and I used to live in a town of less than 3000 people. I had DSL that was 7Mbits/780kbps (actual speed)

I moved to the prefectures capital (less than 200k people), and I can get fibre optics or cable internet, or DSL, etc... Fibre and Cable require a 2 year contract, and you might need to pay the install fee for cable, but they waive it for fibre if you complete the 2 year contract.

Companies here are just forced to upgrade their networks since the Japanese government promotes competition and allows open access to smaller ISP's.


Friday, 01-Jun 20:34:05 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics