<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Solution in search of a problem&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882481</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:55:21 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:55:21 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23902290</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : No one is currently using CV's WiFi for telephone service, which is the topic of this discussion.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23902290</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:42:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23901796</link>
<description><![CDATA[Maccawolf posted : Yeah, well SOME of us don't feel like paying for the rape that is AT&T data, so if OOL is giving me wi-fi access for free. (included in my monthly service), I'm all for it.<br><br>PERSONALLY, I only use it rarely, so I really don't care, but I think it's nice that they are doing it. I know there are MANY who use it on a regular basis. Just that I'm not one of them.<br><small>--<br>Mom and Crockett...... I miss you both!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23901796</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:11:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23900500</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : I'm just saying I don't see the point of a CV WiFi TELEPHONE since cell phones can get coverage everywhere in CV's territory.  CV's WiFi TELEPHONE is pointless.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23900500</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:01:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23900042</link>
<description><![CDATA[SSidlov posted : Not in Montague NJ near High Point.  Thank god you don't live there....<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.Warpstock.org" >www.Warpstock.org</A><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23900042</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:07:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23899750</link>
<description><![CDATA[SSidlov posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/304912" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=304912');">Bobcat79</a>:</small><br><br>What I'm saying is that I see no reason for a WiFi phone, as the cellular service already saturates the entire state and can be used almost anywhere in the US and Canada.<br><br>And when you consider that CV's WiFi coverage is very spotty and will only ever cover a tiny fraction of the state, its pointlessness becomes even more evident.<br> </div>It covers the DENSEST part of the state and not the rolling hills and woods of Bedminster. <br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.Warpstock.org" >www.Warpstock.org</A><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23899750</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:27:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23899735</link>
<description><![CDATA[SSidlov posted : Yeah, you're right also not where they have BURIED cable. Too bad., but everyone there has NIMBY about antennas anyway. <br><br>They are not replacing your WIRED services from them. They are not putting wifi in residential neighborhoods so you can get your neighbor to give you a ool email address to log in with and not pay.  Most residential service is accidental to what they intend to deploy. <br><br>GO OUT and take a look for the silver boxes. ARE they at the shopping center you mention? Are there any at or near the pool? I bet not. That's why.<br><br>BUT MAYBE it's all a conspiracy against you and your ranting all the time, so they decided to NOT put ANY where you live - though I doubt that this is true. <br><br>In my town they put it all along main street, the HS and Middle school.  The bus route in town is  covered and the  HS Football field (not at the HS) is also partially covered since the field/stands are at the FAR end of the park.  We have 7K houses in a couple sq miles. <br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.Warpstock.org" >www.Warpstock.org</A><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23899735</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:25:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23899689</link>
<description><![CDATA[SSidlov posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/304912" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=304912');">Bobcat79</a>:</small><br><br>Wow, look at this coverage map.  Verizon Wireless' map is SOLID RED.<br> </div>FOR CRYING OUT LOUD IT"S NOT THE EQUIVALENT SERVICE AND IT COSTS NOTHING EXTRA TO COMCAST AND OOL CUSTOMERS. <br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.Warpstock.org" >www.Warpstock.org</A><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23899689</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:16:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23899461</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : And only where there are above ground utilities.  Buried utilities means no CV WiFi.<br><br>We have 10 units per acre, shopping centers, a recreation center, pools, tennis courts, and a park, but no CV WiFi.<br><br>Now if I <A HREF="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0340377/"><b>lived in a train station</b></a>, I guess CV's WiFi would be available.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23899461</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:45:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898392</link>
<description><![CDATA[SSidlov posted : THEY DO. <br><br>THEY HAVE. <br><br>THEY DON"T PUT IT IN THE WOODS.  <br><br>THEY PUT IT AT BUS STOPS, and TRAIN STATIONS.<br>THEY PUT IT ON 'MAIN STREET" and ALONG MAJOR BUS ROUTES<br>THEY PUT IT IN PARKS WITH VIEWING STANDS<br><br>BUT they only put it  where they have existing SILVER boxes where they meet the above criteria. They are not deploying extra silver boxes without good reason or just for WiFi. <br><br>Morristown has pretty good coverage.  Somerset has coverage.   <br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.Warpstock.org" >www.Warpstock.org</A><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898392</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:54:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898355</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : Wow, look at this coverage map.  Verizon Wireless' map is SOLID RED.<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/23898355?c=1523709&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMzg4MjY4MS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="84715 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=586 HEIGHT=482 SRC="/r0/download/1523709~b6ecf12df1a139970056c8d736fa1210/wifi.jpg"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898355</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:47:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898346</link>
<description><![CDATA[SSidlov posted : talk apples to apples.  <br><br>CV has not raised their OOL rates at all in 6 years. <br><br>Verizon has constantly changed pricing, and never lowered prices when they offered a better deal to any grandfathered customer without them asking for it. <br><br>Verizon as a telco is subject to additional fees and taxes that cable companies are not subject to. This may change in the future, but it's not now. <br><br>SO WHAT F*ing internet cost went up 50%?  OH, you're not talking about that, you're talking about your TELEVISION.  PUT UP A 100" ANTENNAE and get it for FREE FOREVER -- it's no one's fault that you live in the woods. A very nice section of woods, but far far away from major television transmitters. They just don't want to give it to you for free and they legally made everyone in the Bronx get a box, so why not you? <br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.Warpstock.org" >www.Warpstock.org</A><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898346</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:44:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898311</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/141763" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=141763');">SSidlov</a>:</small><br><br>They can only deploy WIFI where they have existing cable.   </div>They haven't done that, and they never will.  But my Verizon cell phone works everywhere.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898311</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:37:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898304</link>
<description><![CDATA[SSidlov posted : Yeah that's accurate. Let's talk about Verizon's false promise to bring FIOS to everyone in NJ  if the state would change the rules so they didn't have to negotiate with each town and that they weren't cherry picking.....  I am surrounded by FIOS, but it will never come to me.....  and Verizon's cellular is only 2.5G  even on my non-smartphone, I can surf and talk at the same time and have done so.<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.Warpstock.org" >www.Warpstock.org</A><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898304</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:35:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898280</link>
<description><![CDATA[SSidlov posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/304912" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=304912');">Bobcat79</a>:</small><br><br>Hell, CV doesn't have a single WiFi site in my town at all.<br><br>Again, Verizon covers the whole area, making the CV WiFi useless if you have a cellular/WiFi device.  CV WiFi adds nothing.<br> </div>CV doesn't service the entire state of New Jersey, NY or Connecticut.  They can only deploy WIFI where they have existing cable.  YOU live on the edge of their coverage.  I live in a area where I can get WIFI from my house, all the way into NYC.  I can also get 1.5mb service tethered on my cell phone from ATT. So what. Both Verizon and ATT have caps. WIFI that I don't have to pay extra for is pretty nice in my book. <br><br>Stop trolling Cablevison forums. <br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.Warpstock.org" >www.Warpstock.org</A><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898280</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:30:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898259</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : There are ZERO extra fees and charges with my Verizon DSL service.  None.  No taxes.  No fees.  Just the regular monthly rate (which is 29% cheaper than Cablevision).<br><br>I'd still be a Cablevision customer if they hadn't raised the price by 50%!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898259</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:26:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898233</link>
<description><![CDATA[SSidlov posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/304912" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=304912');">Bobcat79</a>:</small><br><br>  wonder if it will be as successful as their satellite TV company.  How many millions did they blow on that?</div>Bobcat you continue to be uninformed. CV's investors (and many customers) continue to be negative about new deployments of tech that are to their benefit in the long term. The people on CV complain all the time about compression and artifacts on HD. CV's satellite was for ALL HD transmission but the cost and the noise and perhaps lacking a partnership with someone else cause them to sell it off.  The CV satellite and the tech that it deployed made it possible for DISH to be alive today and offering all the HD channels they do in better quality and  with less compression.  It was too advanced at the time, but no one could afford to deploy one now.  <br><br>I wish you would stop trolling the CV forums. We all know you don't like them and I'm not even sure you have service from them anymore.  Do you complain about all the fees and extra charges on your dsl account?<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.Warpstock.org" >www.Warpstock.org</A><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23898233</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:21:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23886302</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : I'm comparing CV's WiFi service (or lack thereof) with Verizon Wireless' cellular service (which saturates the entire state).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23886302</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:14:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23886295</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : What I'm saying is that I see no reason for a WiFi phone, as the cellular service already saturates the entire state and can be used almost anywhere in the US and Canada.<br><br>And when you consider that CV's WiFi coverage is very spotty and will only ever cover a tiny fraction of the state, its pointlessness becomes even more evident.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23886295</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:13:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23886052</link>
<description><![CDATA[Maccawolf posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/304912" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=304912');">Bobcat79</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1404694" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1404694');">majortom1029</a>:</small><br><br>Neither verizon nor att has 100 percent coverage in all of the tri state area.  </div>I can guarantee that there's no place in NJ that has a CV Wifi signal but doesn't have a VZW signal. <br><br> </div>I have wifi and have NEVER seen a verizon wifi network. I've seen Comcast, and several other little ones, but never Verizon. (I have cv/ool)<br><br>And yes, I know exactly where the CO for Verizon is because I do communications for the MS 100 in Sept, and it always starts and ends there....<br>(also have a friend who works for ATT across town from them.)<br><small>--<br>Mom and Crockett...... I miss you both!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23886052</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:30:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23885756</link>
<description><![CDATA[fiberguy posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/304912" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=304912');">Bobcat79</a>:</small><br><br>I live in CV's footprint, but CV hates NJ and we're always last to get anything.<br><br>The point is that a cell phone provides far more coverage and mobility.  CV WiFi will provide ZERO additional coverage.  None.  Nada.  Ziltch.  So what's the point of providing nothing?<br> </div>Grow up.<br><br>Edit:<br><br>I suppose that when cable first started laying service in a town for the first time, having service ready only to a limited part of the city was pointless? I suppose when Verizon rolls out LTE to a few cities, that the lack of coverage was pointless? I suppose when Fios only hit a few homes to begin with, it too was useless?<br><br>Are you just trolling? ... or you really that clueless?  If you can't figure out the message you're being told by me, and others, then you're either really clueless or just trolling. Either way, see above.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23885756</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:36:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23885176</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : I live in CV's footprint, but CV hates NJ and we're always last to get anything.<br><br>The point is that a cell phone provides far more coverage and mobility.  CV WiFi will provide ZERO additional coverage.  None.  Nada.  Ziltch.  So what's the point of providing nothing?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23885176</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:44:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23885174</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : Their NOC is in Bedminster. They've never hid that, and they've published photos on their web site.  I know people who work there.<br><br>And you want to know where AT&T's NOC is?  It's also in Bedminster (on the other side of 287).  That's no secret.  They've shown it in TV commercials.  You've probably even seen it, with the 30 or so flatscreen TVs on the wall.  My mother got a tour of the place when she was an AT&T employee.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23885174</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:36:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23885094</link>
<description><![CDATA[patcat88 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/304912" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=304912');">Bobcat79</a>:</small><br><br>Again, Verizon covers the whole area, making the CV WiFi useless if you have a cellular/WiFi device.  CV WiFi adds nothing.<br> </div>Rather than voice, which is relatively cheap nowadays with $99 unlimited from the nationals, and $40 from the regional unlimited (MetroPCS, Cricket, Pocket), unlimited data would be the real lure. Same as ATT Hotspot network and the iPhone.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23885094</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:10:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23884721</link>
<description><![CDATA[fiberguy posted : I don't know about you, but I don't take words out of context..  we're clearly talking about one thing, and you're waaaaaaaaay up on the moon talking about another. <br><br>It's CLEAR you don't live in their WiFi service area, right? I think that other part, you left out, has a LOT to do with "more mobility..."... <br><br>What part of "Maybe this service is more designed <b>for those who <u>live in their</b></u> area/footprint and want to have more mobility..."  <br><br>I speak and apply the English language correctly... <br><br>You CLEARLY over looked that and are trying to twist this around on me. <br><br>Look, not only have I said it, others have too.. this service isn't for you.. move on.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23884721</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:15:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23884123</link>
<description><![CDATA[hottboiinnc posted : And their main customer support centers (VZ and VZW) are based in Ohio.  The page says only where they monitor the cell sites at.  Their massive Centers could be located else where and they would.  Any company that size will NEVER tell you where they're NOCs are at.  And only having 2 of them? I don't think so. Esepcially for a network of that size.<br><small>--<br>www.two-pugs.com    www.twopugsbrand.com</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23884123</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:16:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23883958</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1404694" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1404694');">majortom1029</a>:</small><br><br>Neither verizon nor att has 100 percent coverage in all of the tri state area.  </div>I can guarantee that there's no place in NJ that has a CV Wifi signal but doesn't have a VZW signal.<br><br>VZW has as close to 100% coverage as you can get.  I think there are a few square feet in Stokes State Forest and in the Pine Barrens that don't have coverage.  But CV doesn't go anywhere near those areas.<br><br>Hell, CV doesn't have a single WiFi site in my town at all.<br><br>Again, Verizon covers the whole area, making the CV WiFi useless if you have a cellular/WiFi device.  CV WiFi adds nothing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23883958</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:46:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23883927</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/887660" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=887660');">hottboiinnc</a>:</small><br><br>that NOC is only prolly for your area.  </div>No, it's their primary NOC for their entire network.  It's on Washington Valley Road in Bedminster, NJ.  The backup site is in Texas.  Their corporate headquarters used to be in the same building, but they moved a few miles up the road.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://aboutus.vzw.com/bestnetwork/network_facts.html" >aboutus.vzw.com/bestnetwork/netw&middot;&middot;&middot;cts.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23883927</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:41:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23883910</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1206900" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1206900');">fiberguy</a>:</small><br><br>Knock knock puddin' head... where does this article say "more mobility".... ?  </div>You did!  YOU said it!<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1206900" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1206900');">fiberguy</a>:</small><br><br>Maybe this service is more designed for those who live in their area/footprint and want to have <b>more mobility</b> between their home and they're daily use.</div>OK, "puddin' head"?  (You said that, too, in case you forgot again.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23883910</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:37:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23883562</link>
<description><![CDATA[majortom1029 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/304912" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=304912');">Bobcat79</a>:</small><br><br>But WHY?  If my cell phone works just about everywhere in the US and Canada without roaming, why would I even want to use WiFi hotspots that are so few and far between?<br><br>I made a 45 minute call on the way home today, and I guarantee not a single CV WiFi hotspot was on my route.<br> </div>Neither verizon nor att has 100 percent coverage in all of the tri state area. There are areas on long island where you get no verizon signal at all. So it would be good for those areas. OR places like basements wher ei get an optimum wifi signal but not a carriers cell signal.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23883562</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:25:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23883014</link>
<description><![CDATA[hottboiinnc posted : that NOC is only prolly for your area. Most of their operations is based in Ohio. Especially Customer Service, Billing and Tech Support, for both Wireless and Wireline (which shall be interesting to see VZ move their support center from Ohio to another state- if they do).<br><small>--<br>www.two-pugs.com    www.twopugsbrand.com</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23883014</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:35:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882867</link>
<description><![CDATA[fiberguy posted : Knock knock puddin' head... where does this article say "more mobility".... ? I just re-read Karl's story.. all it talks about is the ability to seamlessly switch between their WiFi and their Cellular network... I don't believe this is about "mobility"... ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882867</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:10:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882815</link>
<description><![CDATA[frogli posted : I heard they will be using AT&T and T-mobile and if so that will be a kick ass network.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882815</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:58:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882706</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/887660" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=887660');">hottboiinnc</a>:</small><br><br>WHY? Because most likely CV has a plan for this.  Maybe their own cell phone company?  </div>I wonder if it will be as successful as their satellite TV company.  How many millions did they blow on that?<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/887660" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=887660');">hottboiinnc</a>:</small><br><br>While near an Access Point you can get free unlimited calls on the network. </div>They don't even have any access points in my entire town.  But Verizon Wireless' Network Operations Center is across the street.  I'm in range of 3 cell sites.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882706</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:38:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882686</link>
<description><![CDATA[hottboiinnc posted : yes but probably using "their" phone or what ever they have in place. They're most likely not going to do it for everyone.  <br><br>They'll more than likely do data, but from the way the story is worded maybe voice as well.  <br><small>--<br>www.two-pugs.com    www.twopugsbrand.com</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882686</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:34:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882681</link>
<description><![CDATA[hottboiinnc posted : WHY? Because most likely CV has a plan for this.  Maybe their own cell phone company? or plans?  While near an Access Point you can get free unlimited calls on the network.  You're not going to get that from TM, ATT, or Sprint.   This would also not be roaming. It would just switch between networks.<br><br>And as the other person said. MAYBE IT'S NOT FOR YOU!<br><small>--<br>www.two-pugs.com    www.twopugsbrand.com</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882681</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:33:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882666</link>
<description><![CDATA[Linklist posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/887660" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=887660');">hottboiinnc</a>:</small><br><br>it's not about replacing the phone. You didn't read what Karl had to say. The phone would work on the WiFi ONLY when near the access point. When it would lose its signal the phone would change back to the cellular network. This would allow CV to offer unlimited voice over their network to THEIR customers.<br> </div>My Palm Pre already does this. Switching automatically to a WiFi connection when within range of one. So if I was a Cablevision user, I should be able to do this without any special phone to do switching.<br><br>Of course, I am talking DATA ONLY switching. The news item doesn't make it clear if they are also talking about a continuous voice call switching back and forth between WiFi and Cell.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882666</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:30:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882598</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : Verizon Wireless has saturated the entire state of New Jersey.<br>The closest CV WiFi is over 2 miles away.<br>So how does that give me "more mobility"?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882598</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:20:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882592</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : But WHY?  If my cell phone works just about everywhere in the US and Canada without roaming, why would I even want to use WiFi hotspots that are so few and far between?<br><br>I made a 45 minute call on the way home today, and I guarantee not a single CV WiFi hotspot was on my route.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882592</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:18:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882560</link>
<description><![CDATA[fiberguy posted : I can help you with your narrow minded thinking if you'd like.. ;)<br><br>... Maybe this service is more designed for those who live in their area/footprint and want to have more mobility between their home and they're daily use. Further, when you're not on their "spotty WiFi coverage" you have the good old fashion cellular network...  (Notice the emphasis on being able to hand off between wifi and cellular networks??)<br><br>So in short, maybe this service wouldn't be the best for YOU. <br><br>People make the same arguments about providers like MetroPCS who's business model is largely on, oh wait, THE METRO in which they serve?? Meaning yea, people complain that they only cover you in the cities it serves and roaming is expensive.. but the point of providers like MetroPCS who started with Flat Rate service for $40 a month wasn't for you to have a cell phone that you could use all over the country.. it was designed to give you service in your home city which they served... in other words, the service wasn't for everyone. <br><br>But besides that, in this case, I don't think you're readying because the service allows you to use a cellular network when you're not on a WiFi.. and  while you are on a WiFi, you don't HAVE to use the cellular network... pretty cool, huh?  :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882560</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:12:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882545</link>
<description><![CDATA[hottboiinnc posted : it's not about replacing the phone. You didn't read what Karl had to say. The phone would work on the WiFi ONLY when near the access point. When it would lose its signal the phone would change back to the cellular network. This would allow CV to offer unlimited voice over their network to THEIR customers.<br><small>--<br>www.two-pugs.com    www.twopugsbrand.com</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882545</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:10:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Solution in search of a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882481</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bobcat79 posted : My cell phones work perfectly in a far greater area than CV's spotty WiFi coverage area.  Why would I want to bother with WiFi?  I can go across the continent with my cell phones.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Solution-in-search-of-a-problem-23882481</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:58:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
