republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Turbocpe
Premium
join:2001-12-22
IA

1 edit

reply to BF69

Re: Not always ISPs fault

Nice, made up, figure. Any sources to support that claim?
I've been a customer for over 10 years and have often seen it be an over utilization issue - you know, since ISPs oversubscribe.

said by BF69 See Profile

I would suspect 50%-80% of the people getting less than advertised speeds are to blame for their own problem. But hey it's easier to blame the ISP than to learn about how to properly enable your connection.
[/BQUOTE :




Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23

said by Turbocpe:

Nice, made up, figure. Any sources to support that claim?
I've been a customer for over 10 years and have often seen it be an over utilization issue - you know, since ISPs oversubscribe.
in no way did he say it was an official figure, he merely said he "suspected".

Also, ALL ISPs oversubscribe, or else it wouldn't be a profitable service; if they had 100% bandwidth for 100% of their customers, the prices you and I would pay would be astronomically higher than we currently pay.

Turbocpe
Premium
join:2001-12-22
IA

1 edit

I realize the oversubscribe model, which is why I noted it, and it serves as good counterpoint to the "50%-80%" of people with speed issues are not the ISPs fault argument. I grant there's likely many cases where it's not the ISP's fault (either the customer's equipment, the end destination, or a possible backbone issue), but that figure is quite high given the fact that we know ISPs are built on the oversubscribe model.

Bandwidth usage is not decreasing. If ISPs don't keep up, or wait until it's too late, customers will (and do) see speed issues.

Of course, we don't have to get into the debate about cost factor. It's pretty obvious that we lack behind other countries in regard to speed and sometimes cost.

said by Fox McCloud:

said by Turbocpe:

Nice, made up, figure. Any sources to support that claim?
I've been a customer for over 10 years and have often seen it be an over utilization issue - you know, since ISPs oversubscribe.
in no way did he say it was an official figure, he merely said he "suspected".

Also, ALL ISPs oversubscribe, or else it wouldn't be a profitable service; if they had 100% bandwidth for 100% of their customers, the prices you and I would pay would be astronomically higher than we currently pay.


David
Now accepting new patients
Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
kudos:70
Reviews:
·AT&T Southwest
·DIRECTV
·AT&T Midwest
·Google Voice

reply to Turbocpe

said by Turbocpe:

Nice, made up, figure. Any sources to support that claim?
I've been a customer for over 10 years and have often seen it be an over utilization issue - you know, since ISPs oversubscribe.
Oh I have plenty of proof! Here's a few of my favorites.

1.) testing their speeds over a VPN connection- Uhh you are testing your corporate network and at last check most VPN's start having connection problems if the MTU is higher than 1300. If your office isn't using a connection speed greater than the T-1, where is your VPN connection going to see 6mbps at?

2.) Synced to their neighbor's wireless at 2.0MB down the street- Here's a clue... you won't get 5.1Mbps if you are not connected to your own equipment! (he actually sent me a screenshot proving he wasn't connected to his own 2wire he paid for!)

3.)Unsecured wireless (this one is my favorite!)- They wonder why their speeds tanked when their neighbors said "Oh look it's Linksys!" (insert leo laporte video here for reference)

4.)using an older network card- My personal favorite was the guy that had elite speeds and had a ISA 10MB network card. Even had the BNC connector on the back next to the Ethernet port! Hey sparky... let's get 2002 compliant shall we? or hell 2000 for that matter!

5.)known firmware issues on 3rd party routers- Had a guy that just bought a brand new dlink router, "Oh no it couldn't be that I just bought a new one!". Had the customer try just a computer and modem and had full speed. Still wasn't satisfied! Sent a field tech @ no charge just to prove it. 2 weeks later I see a post over in the dlink forum here where someone told him that they had that problem and to download the latest firmware it was a firmware problem!

6.)Bad network cards/operating system problem- here's a clue... if you go to another machine and your speeds are acceptable but not on the machine you are worried about, don't you think it would make sense to investigate the machine that is having the problem? No... let's post a direct thread and then get disappointed and angry at me when everything tests good (and on top of that I even show you the stats!) it's as if I was making it up or something!

7.)Spyware/malware- If your machine is starting to turn into your TV by interrupting you with a commercial every 5 minutes, don't you think it's time to investigate that problem? No, it's better to contact me when you can't see your desktop background on your computer and getting 50x as many ads as there was on tv.

8.)Tell your router your connection speed- yea even people who operate the routers sometimes forget to tell the router their connection speed (especially if they upgraded!).

9.)speed test sites (another personal favorite)- had a guy get angry at us once when he couldn't get above 3mbps at this only one speed test site. Guy cussed at us for 2 months straight (we couldn't find a thing wrong and neither could two techs!). Disconnected and went to comcast, found out was getting the same speeds he was on the DSL. Everyone pretty much told him that speed test server must be capped at 3mbps so he isn't going to get 6mbps. Made the invitation to come back to yell at us (at the time elite was a $44.95 promo for life!) because we didn't fix it. I reminded him that several of us asked him to try a different speed test site (even ours) and he wouldn't do it. We were dammed if we did, or dammed if we didn't. We didn't win either way.

10.) Bit-torrent/p2p apps- Ahh yes, here's a clue if you saturate your connection and then wonder why you are getting 100/150 on speed tests with the modem constantly dropping the connection, don't you think you should kill the bit-torrent session before testing? No. Let's post a direct thread and complain about the speeds and the connection! Then admit 2 weeks later in the open forum that you were running a bit-torrent and no one told you that it might affect your connection when you run it at full bore. 2 AT&T techs told you and finally you believed 15 strangers that told you the same thing.. in an open forum.... Frankly I give up!

those are my sources... over the years...
--
If you have a topic in the direct forum please reply to it or a post of mine, I get a notification when you do this.
Koetting Ford, Granite City, illinois... YOU'RE FIRED!!


Simba7
I Void Warranties

join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT

1 edit

reply to Turbocpe

said by Turbocpe:

I realize the oversubscribe model, which is why I noted it, and it serves as good counterpoint to the "50%-80%" of people with speed issues are not the ISPs fault argument. I grant there's likely many cases where it's not the ISP's fault (either the customer's equipment, the end destination, or a possible backbone issue), but that figure is quite high given the fact that we know ISPs are built on the oversubscribe model.
One reason they do this is because every ISP (including mine) would require a (1mbpsx10000users=10GigE) link on their backbone. Do you honestly think most states have a 40GigE or 100GigE fiber going through them? I highly doubt it. Most are lucky to have a OC12 or 24. A few an OC3.

Some people think DSL is the answer.. Wrong.. Any DSL ISP is as guilty as any other ISP when it comes to oversubscribing.

Bandwidth is not *infinite* as most people think. Plus, you can't instantly lay new fiber (do you realize how much a mile of fiber costs?).

Ideally, each state should have a 100GigE (or TerE) Backbone, then interconnect each state via a 100GigE (or TerE) connection. Then bandwidth shouldn't be much of an issue.
--
Bresnan 15M/1M
MyWS[P4HT@3.2GHz,2GB RAM,2x1TB HDDs,Win7]
WifeWS[P4HT@3GHz,2GB RAM,60GB HDD,Win7]
Router[2xP3@1GHz,512MB RAM,18GB HDD,SMC 8432BTA,2xDigital DE504,Compaq NC3131,Intel Pro/1000MT,IBM Gigabit Ethernet-SX,Allied Telesyn AT-2560FX,Gentoo Linux]

Turbocpe
Premium
join:2001-12-22
IA

reply to David
I could make a list like that myself and make up some numbers. That's not proof. Where's the 50%-80% figure in there?



David
Now accepting new patients
Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
kudos:70
Reviews:
·AT&T Southwest
·DIRECTV
·AT&T Midwest
·Google Voice

3 edits

multiply that by as least 250 techs in this center alone, your 50 to 80% becomes justified really quick. If you want to go by inside and outside techs, I think at last check there's as least 20,000 of us. Assuming as least one call a day gets lost to any of the above 10 scenarios that's 20,000 calls a day, by 365 days a year you get 7.3 million calls a year (or 42% of 17 mil customers) for just tier 2 and tier 3 techs. I didn't even include tier 1 techs, which might easily raise that another 8 to 10% easy (again assuming common problems solved by tier 1 such as loose connections, power cycling modems, and the simple resolutions).

There's my numbers.

Here's another prime example of end user problems that they want to lay blame on the ISP. Again #10 in my list easily comes into play.

»[Xtreme] I Hereby Accuse AT&T Bellsouth of Throttlling Speed

Anyone in a helpdesk/IT support type of function would easily see 50-80% easy. Anyone not or has never served that role won't understand and of course "Blame the ISP".

--
If you have a topic in the direct forum please reply to it or a post of mine, I get a notification when you do this.
Koetting Ford, Granite City, illinois... YOU'RE FIRED!!


Turbocpe
Premium
join:2001-12-22
IA

2 edits

Oh. You work for an ISP. Makes sense.

You know the model is built on oversubscription and that bandwidth usage is not declining, but is instead increasing. Yeah, sure, 50%-80% of the problems are user-inflected issues/ Let's just all buy that figure that was pulled out of the ass. No one has provided a list of actual figures, just excuses.

You provide a list of reasons why customers can see slow speeds, due to non-ISP issues, but that doesn't tell us anything about percentage.

I've been here a bit longer than you, and I've gone through more than a few times of overcapacity issues from either DSL or cable. And so has many on this website. Of course this website doesn't represent the majority, but given we know that the model is built on oversubscription and the race ISPs have of offering the fastest speeds, at some of the time, overutilization can, and frequently does, happen.

said by David:

multiply that by as least 250 techs in this center alone, your 50 to 80% becomes justified really quick. If you want to go by inside and outside techs, I think at last check there's as least 20,000 of us. Assuming as least one call a day gets lost to any of the above 10 scenarios that's 20,000 calls a day, by 365 days a year you get 7.3 million calls a year (or 42% of 17 mil customers) for just tier 2 and tier 3 techs. I didn't even include tier 1 techs, which might easily raise that another 8 to 10% easy (again assuming common problems solved by tier 1 such as loose connections, power cycling modems, and the simple resolutions).

There's my numbers.

Here's another prime example of end user problems that they want to lay blame on the ISP. Again #10 in my list easily comes into play.

»[Xtreme] I Hereby Accuse AT&T Bellsouth of Throttlling Speed

Anyone in a helpdesk/IT support type of function would easily see 50-80% easy. Anyone not or has never served that role won't understand and of course "Blame the ISP".


Saturday, 02-Jun 16:26:27 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics