 GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8 | Lower Caps Of course that comes with less competition.
I'm sure Comcast will lower caps to 100GB or something insane in telco under-served areas.
It's all about the $.
--
My Blog 2.0 | |
|
 openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | Re: Lower Caps Because Comcast has done that in current telco under-served areas  I really wish people would stop spreading FUD that Comcast will lower its 250 GB cap. Comcast set the floor...caps will only increase as the infrastructure build out continues. | |
|
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2 Reviews:
 ·Comcast
| Doubt it actually. Too much bad press, and Comcast has taken a monolithic approach to pricing wherever possible; aside from promotions and channel counts you can get the same package anywhere in their footprint for the same price. Things are a lot easier to administer that way. | |
|
| | said by Gbcue:Of course that comes with less competition. I'm sure Comcast will lower caps to 100GB or something insane in telco under-served areas. It's all about the $. How does lowering the caps make it all about the money? | |
|
 | GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8 Reviews:
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| Re: Lower Caps said by LeftOfSanity:said by Gbcue:Of course that comes with less competition. I'm sure Comcast will lower caps to 100GB or something insane in telco under-served areas. It's all about the $. How does lowering the caps make it all about the money? Easier chances for overage $.
--
My Blog 2.0 | |
|
| |  DaveDudeNo Fear
join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
kudos:1
 ·Vonage
·ViaTalk
| Re: Lower Caps said by Gbcue:said by LeftOfSanity:said by Gbcue:Of course that comes with less competition. I'm sure Comcast will lower caps to 100GB or something insane in telco under-served areas. It's all about the $. How does lowering the caps make it all about the money? Easier chances for overage $. Where is this happening now ?
--
They Live... We Sleep...
“Spreading the wealth around” never results in a better outcome for people. It always results in destruction.
| |
|
| | fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | said by Gbcue:said by LeftOfSanity:said by Gbcue:Of course that comes with less competition. I'm sure Comcast will lower caps to 100GB or something insane in telco under-served areas. It's all about the $. How does lowering the caps make it all about the money? Easier chances for overage $. Like it was said before.. FUD.. and people can spread it just as much as business and politicians..
You have nothing to base your statement on. As it was said, comcast has pretty much based their pricing out on a national basis.. they set the best cap of all providers to this date. They consistently raise their speeds and offerings.. they've RARELY raised their HSI prices..
Do you have ONE shred of evidence, VALID evidence, that remotely supports your argument that they'll lower caps to 100gb? ... other than "just because...."....?
So far, of the cable operators, I think Comcast has been the better of the players over all.
When people demanded caps be defined, not only did they get them, they were the best so far. I believe TWC wanted, what, 5gb? I think Frontier Telco wanted the same.. I believe the big grand daddy AT&T wanted about 10gb + overage charges? But Comcast says 250gb and it's still not enough...
So far comcast hasn't asked for overage $ as you're implying...
I WILL state that if they do start charging for anything, it will be a metered plan but even then, I bet it will be an option along side of other "capped" plans. | |
|
|
|
