4 edits | United States the new Argentina I mean why advertise in a harsh competing way that reflects a reality that is basically non-existent when every business slated in the same market segment just cherry picks, penny pinching for top shareholders and swaps/spins off rural regions so all (except the knowledgeable customer) can be happy? It is not as if either AT&T nor Time Warner in most locations have stiff competition nor the FCC has implemented any effective measures to date ensuring a diverse marketplace of choice.
No side in this thread is entirely right but the BBB seems to be more content with sedating the public for the sake of big business by pacifying advertising rather then actually responding to meaningful threats to the individual, just like every other "consumer advocate" NGO and executive agency has been doing.
What I am simply stating is their is too much consolidation and agreement between business, political and so called non-governmental advocates to ever come up with any compromise that benefits that are meaningful for customers. |
|
| Both companies are screwed up. AT&T, with their cheapo FTTN, can't brag about being able to bring decent bandwidth to all their customers.
And Time Warner, who somehow thinks customers won't notice that they're not upgrading to DOCSIS 3.0, while other cable providers are.
What have these guys been smoking? |
|
