site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
430
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Sahrin

join:2004-05-15
Houston, TX

You've Got it Backwards

TWC IS wrong, theoretically. If there are any cases of performance degradation (and only AT&T could say this for sure), this would be a technical situation. Theoretically, AT&T's network is designed to sustain the advertised speeds.

I really don't think it's a good idea for Cable, which uses shared bandwidth for users per node, to criticize anyone about performance degradation. VDSL degradation should theoretically be constant (unless it's some outside force not related to HDTV signals); Cable gets slow at the times when people actually want to use the internet (and instead of being a hypothetical without actual evidence - there are many users who have experienced slowdown at peak usage times due to shared channel usage).

Instead of suing TWC, AT&T should start running attack ads and put them in their place.

(Well, no, it would be better if they competed on features and price - but since TWC is resorting to BS I don't really have a problem with AT&T doing the same).

dolmar4

join:2004-01-16
Beverly Hills, CA

said by Sahrin:

TWC IS wrong, theoretically. If there are any cases of performance degradation (and only AT&T could say this for sure), this would be a technical situation. Theoretically, AT&T's network is designed to sustain the advertised speeds.
I guess you do not have U-Verse otherwise you would not have made the above statement. It is a well known fact that if you are on the highest internet service plan that your profile can handle if you have are using your TV with more than 1 HD then your full internet bandwidth is not available. ie 19/2 profile with Max internet service, 25/3 with Max Plus internet or 32/5 with Max Turbo internet service.

said by Sahrin:

I really don't think it's a good idea for Cable, which uses shared bandwidth for users per node, to criticize anyone about performance degradation.
I guess you do not understand how cable nor how DSL or VDSL2 works, both are shared at some point and neither is a dedicated service, Cable is shared @ the nod and U-Verse is shared at the DSLAM which in effect is almost the same as a Node because everyone in your area is hooked up to the same VRAD, so if the Vrad is overloaded it will effect everyone on that Vrad.

Also if you turn on your TV that does not effect your internet service at all on cable and on U-Verse depending on the internet plan you choose it could impact your service if you are on any of the max plans depending on your profile like stated above.

hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

All of the internet is shared. that's how it was built and will always be. It's just all shared at different parts.
--
www.two-pugs.com www.twopugsbrand.com


bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here
kudos:1

reply to dolmar4
There is no 25/3 speed profile.

The affect of TV on internet is fairly minor.


Saturday, 02-Jun 16:35:17 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics