 DreadR.I.P JazzyPremium
join:2005-02-28
Bronx, NY
kudos:6 | reply to theeinstein
Re: disgusting Yup working as intended.
I find it funny that there is no Google search on the device despite being a on Android OS, way to fail AT&T
--
Assuming Direct Control. |
|
| Its pretty sad that Google even allows it.. It proves that even they will bend over to the dollar! |
|
| If they didn't allow it, it would look bad on them. |
|
 elios
join:2005-11-15
Springfield, MO | reply to Dread
doesnt that kinda defeat the point of Android?
makes me wonder if it even has the google maps GPS ap |
|
| reply to theeinstein
said by theeinstein:Its pretty sad that Google even allows it.. It proves that even they will bend over to the dollar! Google released Android as open source software, so it can be modified at will by anyone who wants to use it. So AT&T took Android, crippled the hell out of it, and handed it to Moto to load onto the Backflip. Google had no say in the matter. |
|
| It really doesn't matter....everyone knew this would be the result once AT&T got a hold of it so this should be no surprise.
The only real surprise here is that people thought that AT&T would allow an open source platform onto thier network.
--
BF69~~~Please stop suffocating gerbils! |
|
| reply to ISurfTooMuch
said by ISurfTooMuch:said by theeinstein:Its pretty sad that Google even allows it.. It proves that even they will bend over to the dollar! Google released Android as open source software, so it can be modified at will by anyone who wants to use it. So AT&T took Android, crippled the hell out of it, and handed it to Moto to load onto the Backflip. Google had no say in the matter. I'm no IP lawyer, but Android appears to be somewhat dual-licensed. What I mean is that it runs the Linux kernel and the kernel is licensed under the GPL, which means any modifications must, by law, be released as open source. However, the Google side of the OS (the more user-level stuff) is mostly licensed under the Apache license which does allow a company to modify the source for proprietary reasons (much like the BSD license which is what allowed Apple to take BSD and modify it without giving back). So, really, I guess we can blame Google for releasing much of Android under a license that is not copyleft friendly.
At any rate, I think it's a matter of time before this device is hacked by reverse engineers.
--
Getting people to stop using windows is more or less the same as trying to get people to stop smoking tobacco products. They dont want to change; they are happy with slowly dying inside. -- munky99999 |
|
 C0deZer0Oc'D To Rhythm And PolicePremium
join:2001-10-03
Davenport, FL | reply to elios
said by elios:doesnt that kinda defeat the point of Android? makes me wonder if it even has the google maps GPS ap and not have an opportunity to charge you an extra $10/month for AT&T's own "navigator" service? surely, you can't be serious. 
--
Front Line Force Fortress Forever |
|
| reply to theeinstein
Its pretty sad that Google even allows it.. It proves that even they will bend over to the dollar!
thats where you are wrong at that only shows what you think you know, android is a OPEN SOURCE program there for att can do what it wants to it, it show how much greater android is over the iphone. Android= America, Iphone= Iraq (pre-war) |
|
