| What next? Frontier makes promises to the ICC commissioners in order to gain approval, but which will make the situation worse for them financially. The Illinois Commerce Commission will then approve the deal. The extra demanded promises(like expanding DSL) will almost certainly make it much harder for Frontier to succeed.
What the ICC should do is enforce reasonable promises for approval that would improve the chances for success:
- like demand Frontier pay less to Verizon for the assets in Illinois.
- & demand that the Verizon negotiated union contracts be abrogated and new Frontier ones be negotiated at lower costs.
- & allow prices to rise instead of demanding they stay the same.
The above would much better reflect the reality that Verizon is selling poorly maintained assets and that Frontier will have its hands full just getting the system back up to spec. Having Frontier promise to start expanding broadband before these other tasks are done will only make things worse.
But I expect NEITHER side here to recognize the reality. Frontier will over-promise and the ICC commissioners will demand things that can't be done. Class action lawsuits to follow within a year. |
|
Reviews:
 ·Frontier Communi..
4 edits | said by fAcEtIOUs:What the ICC should do is enforce reasonable promises for approval that would improve the chances for success: . . . . - & demand that the Verizon negotiated union contracts be abrogated and new Frontier ones be negotiated at lower costs. - . . . Verizon is selling poorly maintained assets and that Frontier will have its hands full just getting the system back up to spec. Having Frontier promise to start expanding broadband before these other tasks are done will only make things worse. But I expect NEITHER side here to recognize the reality. Frontier will over-promise and the ICC commissioners will demand things that can't be done. Class action lawsuits to follow within a year. 1) Chances of Illinois ICC demanding that the union contracts to be abrogated is just slightly this side of Zero.
MAR_03_2002, union strength in Illinois, and its state government, is strong. That's why this ICC ALJudge did what she did. She threw a bone to the Illinois IBEW and organized labor. It's just part of the Kabuki dance, to show Illinois Labor that State of IL govt on their side. But, that does not mean that Illinois ICC will formally reject the sale.
2)"Verizon's poorly maintained assets" . True, since the 2000 merger of GTE and Verizon. Verizon has chosen to invest in(and keep) the old GTE properties in Texas, Southern California, and Florida. It has ignored the Midwest, and its more rural areas.
3)"Frontier will over-promise and the ICC commissioners will demand things that can't be done. " Agreed on the Frontier promise and the ICC demands. State/local governments don't appreciate the advance of technology, and just want to keep feeding off the telcos. They look upon the telcos as proverbial golden geese.
4)ICC will eventually approve the deal, after some Frontier response. They just need political cover for the future.
5)Frontier's 13.7% dividend yield is not sustainable, nor is its expected post-acquisition 10% dividend yield
6)Ironic that 1 of 2 Verizon Super Head End(SHE) FiOS satellite farm facilities is located on west side of Bloomington, Illinois, when Verizon is selling their Illinois wireline properties and have no FiOS within 200+ miles of the farm.
7)Since these Illinois Verizon/Frontier areas are not located near Chicago, this case tends to receive minimal Illinois press coverage.
8) Illinois ICC finally put up the link to the ICC AL Judge's 46 page "Proposed Order" »www.icc.illinois.gov/docket/file···d=147716
The important point is that this is NOT the final word on this, and will be subject to more work at the Illinois ICC.
9) Some interesting points by ALJ Tapia:
--Disputed evidence whether Verizon and Frontier currently meet ICC minimum support standards.
--Frontier bond credit ratings are substantially below Verizon. They are below investment grade. By the way, bond ratings are extremely important for utilities, because they borrow lots of money. Major impact on their ability to pay debt. Similar to an individual's credit rating and the cost to borrow.
--ALJ found that Verizon South (1 of the 2 Verizon ILECs in IL) had not met the ICC 80% broadband availability req by Jan 1 2005, or even now. (Verizon South is the smaller country cousin ILEC in IL.) Oh, the required speed was the 200 Kbps . Wow, super speedy. I remember when that speed was a dream. Now, it's pitiful. |
|
DolganPremium
join:2005-10-01
Sun Prairie, WI Reviews:
 ·Charter
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
quote:
& demand that the Verizon negotiated union contracts be abrogated and new Frontier ones be negotiated at lower costs.
Why should the Union be forced to negotiate their contract when they are against this deal that benefits no one but Verizon and its shareholders? If any contracts need to be abrogated, and redefined, it would be the contracts the idiot execs at Frontier have--take away their golden parachutes and lets see if they still would want this deal.
|
|
Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..
| Because what gives the union contracts power over any other contract? When Sprint bought Nextel; Sprint laid off much of Nextel; even the employees under contract; they had no obligation to keep them. So why does Frontier have to keep those union contracts? After all they didn't sign those contracts with Frontier; they were signed with VZ. The same as the contracts with any other merger/buyout. Those new companies say who gets to stay and who doesn't. The union should be no different. After all that's what turned this country- especially the Midwest- aka DT and Toledo into the problems they have now the unions and their contracts.
--
www.twopugsbrand.com ONLINE STORE NOW ONLINE! up to 50% off SRP of Happy Tails Spa products. |
|
