site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:30
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

4 edits

reply to espaeth

Re: This makes even less sense than the Exaflood argument

You do the same shit, Karl. You create editorial after editorial about how providers need to upgrade their networks because all kinds of high bandwidth applications are going to catch on any day now.
Technically, most of my editorials focus on the fact that carriers should put the money back into the network instead of suckling at the teet of myopic investors who put immediate returns ahead of the company's long-range future or consumers. I also frequently argue that a lack of competition in the sector impacts said investment.

I've never argued that "providers need to upgrade their networks because all kinds of high bandwidth applications are going to catch on any day now," and in fact I've often argued that 100 Mbps home connections are largely marketing. But sure, if it makes you feel better to think my ten years of work here on hundreds of topics is the same thing as fake industry science used to con the public, fine. That's sweet. Wrong, and insulting as shit, but sweet.

Ironic though that you'd distort my positions and then complain about me distorting positions.
Yes, I'll acknowledge the Exaflood propaganda is garbage, but it's only made worse by your misinterpretation of it.
Yes, clearly the problem is with me misrepresenting fake junk science based on completely fabricated data by pointing out that it's junk science based on completely fabricated data.
Augmenting core capacity isn't going to do squat when the key bottleneck in path congestion is the last mile.
I believe I already agreed with you. The story you're commenting on that I wrote says the same thing. I also appreciate your network insights and they make excellent sense. But again, I'd argue the core enemy of your tirade would be Cisco's marketing department.

Either the world as we know it is ending due to network management and capacity problems (that can only be fixed by "X" -- deregulation, fewer consumer protections, whatever), or the CRS-3 helps put those fears to bed and network engineers are savvy enough to consistently be ahead of capacity demand. The industry doesn't get to argue both things when it's convenient for them.

Saturday, 02-Jun 16:41:13 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics