site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

reply to n2jtx

Re: Ala Carte?

You're making a good point for an argument I've always had..

The government deems locals to be "necessary" which is why you have to have them included in the first tier. However, not everyone wants to get their locals through cable AND BE CHARGED FOR THEM for what they can already have for free. Yet, government has made no effort to remove the locals from any forced tiers... believe it or not, some people buy basic tier1 cable JUST for the educational community (PEG) channels... not locals.

Until the change their view on "the importance of locals" in tier 1 programming and the rules, they're not going to touch satellite based networks.

Government also believes that the locals are that important that they must be on tier 1, they must be in the clear, etc etc, etc... so why does the government allow local networks to charge cable for simply re-transmitting them as well? They ARE a public right... and the cable company IS part of the public just like any other business or home user.

Saturday, 02-Jun 16:46:17 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics