| Great service from windjammer lately My internet connection has been great from windjammer for a while now. I get about 14.5mb download speed and 734kbps upload speed. I get this for 54.95 a month. My only complaint would be that i wish the upload speed would at least be 1 or 2 mb upload with 15mb download speeds. Other than that i really like the download speed. I'm just hoping they eventually upgrade to docsis 3.0 in the future here. That would be great. |
|
jimbopalmerTsar of all the Rushers
join:2008-06-02
Greenwood, MS
kudos:2 Reviews:
 ·Windjammer Cable
| 5 meg down/ 768k up
Windjammer has no idea why I pay what I do, but any plan they CAN explain costs more, so I am not changing. (I am ex-Adelphia, ex-Time Warner)
--
I tried to remain child-like, all I achieved was childish. |
|
iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2 | reply to Gib4500
Our of curiosity, what do your traceroutes look like at this point? You said in your review that the company is using a Qwest backbone in your area right now. How do traceroutes fare? Like to Google, SoftLayer.com, etc. |
|
| Here is a traceroute to google.com
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms . [192.168.1.1]
2 9 ms 7 ms 9 ms 10.32.160.1
3 22 ms 33 ms 23 ms cer-edge-15.inet.qwest.net
4 22 ms 21 ms 23 ms cer-core-02.inet.qwest.net
5 21 ms 23 ms 21 ms chp-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net
6 20 ms 21 ms 22 ms 63.146.27.22
7 22 ms 31 ms 21 ms ae-32-52.ebr2.Chicago1.Level3.net
8 51 ms 52 ms 53 ms ae-3-3.ebr2.Atlanta2.Level3.net
9 51 ms 51 ms 52 ms ae-11-51.car1.Atlanta1.Level3.net
10 51 ms 51 ms 51 ms GOOGLE-INC.car1.Atlanta1.Level3.net
11 53 ms 61 ms 54 ms 209.85.254.243
12 53 ms 55 ms 51 ms 209.85.253.161
13 54 ms 53 ms 53 ms yw-in-f104.1e100.net |
|
