<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Anything but VZW&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23958749</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:13:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:13:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23966166</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bill Dollar posted : While I think the plan sucks and "expanding the contribution base" for USF to include consumer broadband is a terrible idea, Burstein frankly doesn't understand what he is talking about on this specific issue.  He's a IP telecom guy, not a POTS one, and it shows in his 3:29 am analysis here.<br><br>What is being floated, is that sometime after the year 2017, intercarrier compensation fees paid by interstate long distance carriers to local ILECs will be phased down (they are essentially a hidden cross-subsidy now for rural carriers).  After 2020 the system will move to bill and keep.<br><br>What the plan suggests, that in some cases, (under a completely new cost allocation system, where all revenues (voice, video, data) and all network costs are taken into account, unlike today), local Incumbent Exchange carriers will be able, in some states, to raise the Subscriber Line Charge, which is currently $6.50, by a couple of bucks at most if they can demonstrate that this is needed to recover costs.<br><br>The plan also talks about "rate-rebalancing" in a few states where state regulators have kept the price for basic local service artificially low compared to the national average.<br><br>But what is important to note here, and what Burstein fails to understand: <br><br>1) These potential increases will only ever apply to customers of traditional phone service -- Cable VoIP and Wireless are not permitted to charge SLCs, rates are not regulated by any entity, and are not permitted to bill long-distance carriers at the inflated interstate access fee.  <br><br>2) This is not even going to happen until 2017; <br><br>3) When it does happen, it is unlikely to impact anyone, because the entire subsidy formula will have changed, accounting for currently-off-the-books data and video revenues (when all costs are billed for recovery). i.e. the rural guys who are feeding at the subsidy trough will find themselves unable to raise the SLC.<br><br>I appreciate Dave Burstein's work, and he's dead on about how the NBP doesn't address affordability, but in this case, his analysis suffers from lack of complete understanding about the USF/ICC debate.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23966166</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:27:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23962317</link>
<description><![CDATA[Duramax08 posted : $5-$10 is alot. If this fee gets put into place, Not to many people will like it. 1 cent to maybe $3 is ok but only if it expands broadband to other areas. I would also be fine if it works on existing broadband service. Like I said on another thread, Im paying for 6/1 and only getting 500/100. Dont know who is at fault since im further away from the tower but they send ads saying its available at your location. They even call me asking if I want a usb modem for $10 more. Uh, why would I need that since I only get 1-2 bars and its crappy service. ISP: Clear.<br><small>--<br>Would like a landline but wireless will work for now.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23962317</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:04:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23961350</link>
<description><![CDATA[cmaenginsb1 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/625141" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=625141');">pnh102</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1570999" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1570999');">Duramax08</a>:</small><br><br>"The plan annoyingly omits how much this fee could be, but once the details are hashed out, it could raise your monthly broadband bill from anywhere from $1 to $5 a month."<br><br>....<br> </div>You missed this:<br><br>  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>the plan could actually wind up with American families paying $5-$10 more a month <hr></blockquote><br><br> </div>except that in theory by using money from the USF, instead of paying $275 for 3G he would be paying $60 + up to $10 for another carrier.  Saving him $215 a month.<br>Of course it doesn't work out so well for those already covered.<br><small>--<br>CCNA, Comtrain Certified Tower Climber</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23961350</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:02:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23960010</link>
<description><![CDATA[pnh102 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1570999" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1570999');">Duramax08</a>:</small><br><br>"The plan annoyingly omits how much this fee could be, but once the details are hashed out, it could raise your monthly broadband bill from anywhere from $1 to $5 a month."<br><br>....<br> </div>You missed this:<br><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>the plan could actually wind up with American families paying $5-$10 more a month <hr></blockquote><br><small>--<br>"Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23960010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:36:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959701</link>
<description><![CDATA[Duramax08 posted : "The plan annoyingly omits how much this fee could be, but once the details are hashed out, it could raise your monthly broadband bill from anywhere from $1 to $5 a month."<br><br>....<br><small>--<br>Would like a landline but wireless will work for now.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959701</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:18:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959491</link>
<description><![CDATA[pnh102 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1570999" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1570999');">Duramax08</a>:</small><br><br>so on average it would be like $60 plus a small tax.</div>Heh.  We have lots of small taxes and fees tacked onto our bills.  What's the harm in one more?<br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1570999" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1570999');">Duramax08</a>:</small><br><br> That was a one time charge since the user went of there limit. atleast they are telling us now of a small fee. If they didnt, I bet you wouldnt notice the few cents extra on your bill if you auto bill. </div>Except it is not a few cents, it is between $1 to $10.<br><small>--<br>"Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959491</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:39:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dump It</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Dump-It-23959464</link>
<description><![CDATA[Sammer posted : It's already well known that many who don't have broadband even where it is available say it's too expensive. Making broadband more expensive and seeking spectrum from broadcasters (get the additional spectrum entirely from the government, not potential wireless competitors) makes the plan a failure from the start.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Dump-It-23959464</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:34:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959432</link>
<description><![CDATA[Duramax08 posted : so on average it would be like $60 plus a small tax. That was a one time charge since the user went of there limit. atleast they are telling us now of a small fee. If they didnt, I bet you wouldnt notice the few cents extra on your bill if you auto bill.<br><small>--<br>Would like a landline but wireless will work for now.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959432</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:28:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959115</link>
<description><![CDATA[pnh102 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1570999" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1570999');">Duramax08</a>:</small><br><br>get real.............. </div>Is my math off?<br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>it could raise your monthly broadband bill from anywhere from $1 to $5 a month.<hr></blockquote><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>the plan could actually wind up with American families paying $5-$10 more a month <hr></blockquote><br>So we're looking at a tax hike of $1 to $10 a month per subscription.  The original poster paid $275 in one month, simple math tells us that under this plan the poster would have paid between $276 and $285 instead.<br><small>--<br>"Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959115</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:24:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959072</link>
<description><![CDATA[jjeffeory posted : Oh, I stand corrected. That sucks!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959072</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:15:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959057</link>
<description><![CDATA[Linklist posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/731512" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=731512');">jjeffeory</a>:</small><br><br>Again. this isn't an extra fee, it's the USF rebranded. <br> </div>No, the plan talks about adding another fee. Not just repurposing the USF.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://mmod.ncaa.com/">NCAA&reg; March Madness on Demand&reg;</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959057</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:13:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959037</link>
<description><![CDATA[jjeffeory posted : .... I stand corrected.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959037</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:10:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dump It</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Dump-It-23959027</link>
<description><![CDATA[jjeffeory posted : .]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Dump-It-23959027</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:09:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959022</link>
<description><![CDATA[Duramax08 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/625141" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=625141');">pnh102</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by Upstate NY :</small><br><br>I got a bill for $275 from Verizon Wireless this month because I went over the 5 GB limit. Give me anything but Verizon! </div>And under this plan you'll pay $276 to $285.  Isn't that swell?<br> </div>get real..............<br><small>--<br>Would like a landline but wireless will work for now.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23959022</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:08:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23958895</link>
<description><![CDATA[pnh102 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by Upstate NY :</small><br><br>I got a bill for $275 from Verizon Wireless this month because I went over the 5 GB limit. Give me anything but Verizon! </div>And under this plan you'll pay $276 to $285.  Isn't that swell?<br><small>--<br>"Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Anything-but-VZW-23958895</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:44:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Anything but VZW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Anything-but-VZW-23958808</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I got a bill for $275 from Verizon Wireless this month because I went over the 5 GB limit. Give me anything but Verizon!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Anything-but-VZW-23958808</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:34:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Dump It</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Dump-It-23958749</link>
<description><![CDATA[pnh102 posted :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>The bill could actually increase the cost of broadband and phone service.<hr></blockquote><br>This alone makes this plan a non-starter.  You cannot make something more affordable by raising the price.<br><br>I hope all you people out there who were clammoring for central planning with regards to broadband are happy now, and will cheerfully pay this tax every month.<br><small>--<br>"Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Dump-It-23958749</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:20:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
