MadtownPremium
join:2008-04-26
Madera, CA | reply to seaprobe
Re: IP-DSLAM FAQ said by seaprobe:As always, it depends on what you want to do. Wireless "n" will give better range, by and large, so if you have trouble with the signal reaching throughout your house, go for it. If you copy files wirelessly among your computers for streaming video and music or just backups to a file share, it will be way faster. If all you are doing is using the internet, you are wasting your money.
What are you planning to use it for?
I watch youtube videos, upload youtube videos, I watch movies on Netflix on my Xbox 360, and play Xbox Live games along with regular web surfing too. |
|
 LaurielPremium
join:2003-05-25
Sacramento, CA
1 edit | reply to gdm
I am considering U-Verse, as I am kind of far from my CO (13,300 feet.) I cannot get very much speed on regular ADSL (about 2.5 down.) I am wondering a couple of things:
1. What kind of distance from the origination point (VRAD or CO?) is going to allow me to get the speeds advertised with U-Verse? I'm looking at the 12 down speed.
2. Why is a tech installation required if I go for the 18 or 24 down, but not if I got for the 12 or lower? What is different?
Thanks. |
|
| reply to Madtown
As always, it depends on what you want to do. Wireless "n" will give better range, by and large, so if you have trouble with the signal reaching throughout your house, go for it. If you copy files wirelessly among your computers for streaming video and music or just backups to a file share, it will be way faster. If all you are doing is using the internet, you are wasting your money.
What are you planning to use it for? |
|
MadtownPremium
join:2008-04-26
Madera, CA | reply to gdm
For those on IP-DSLAM would this work, »www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004PA···i=507846 or be a waste of money to buy? |
|
|
|
| reply to ILpt4U
How to find out how the IPDSLSM is provisioned ? |
|
| reply to ILpt4U
can you tell me why a tech install is required for max. 18? |
|
 ILpt4UPremium
join:2006-11-12
Lisle, IL
kudos:4 | reply to robertshr
The FAQ needs an update: Max (12 down/1 up) and Max Plus (18 down/1 up) speeds are now available over IPDSLAM ADSL2+ U-Verse, as long as the customer lives close enough to the CO
Max 18 does require a tech install, though |
|
| reply to Nana
Currently the only Modem ((Motorola 2210-02-1ATT) is available fore the ATT IPDSLAM the gateway is for customers that are abel to get the whole u-verse package and only want the IPDSLAM Internet. |
|
 rstrickPremium
join:2003-06-02
Springfield, MO | reply to stunod2002
I don't think the Westell will work on IP-DSLAM. It's just another ADSL/ADSL2 modem as far as I can tell. |
|
| reply to stunod2002
Are you sure this modem will work with this system? This is not typical adsl and as far as I can find this modem does not support IP-DSLAM. |
|
| reply to dragonman300
said by dragonman300:That Westell A90-610025 modem is used for Verizon dsl. Does this model will work fine with AT&T?
Sorry, mis-typed... It's an F90-610025 |
|
| reply to stunod2002
That Westell A90-610025 modem is used for Verizon dsl. Does this model will work fine with AT&T? |
|
| reply to ILpt4U
Q. What equipment is used?
A. There are currently two different provided equipment to choose from: 1. AT&T Gateway (2Wire 2701HGV-B) 2. Modem ((Motorola 2210-02-1ATT)
--
Stunod |
|
ILpt4UPremium
join:2006-11-12
Lisle, IL
kudos:4 | reply to pm_
IPDSLSM U-Verse can be provisioned Fast Path or Interleaved.
Mine is Fast Path |
|
pm_
join:2009-10-11
Aurora, IL | reply to gdm
Could you please update this FAQ to state that IP-DSLAM can actually be provisioned as Fast Path? That's important information for users to have.
My source is ILpt4U here:
»Re: [Speed Problem] Download Slow Between 4:00pm to 1:00am
And no one has stated anything to the contrary. |
|
| reply to gdm
Is AT&T ever going to release the RADIUS GAS authentication details publicly including the certs so I can use a 3rd party ADSL2+ modem with your IP-DSLAM product (and authentication with your upstream 7330 DSLAM/7450 ESS (Ethernet Service Switch)) in the CO? I'm reading ALU docs BTW. |
|
Reviews:
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·AT&T Midwest
 ·voip.ms
| reply to DBman190
said by cramer:they will continue to be served by existing (legacy) DSLAMs. (until they get around to upgrading those too.)
What exactly is the long-term plan for the CO DSLAMs? Are they going to retire the old DSLAMs on a schedule or just let them run until they die?
And at that point will they swing us over to the VDSL VRADs or expand ADSL2+ to overlay with VDSL instead of just offering one or the other?
--
USNG:
16TDN2870
Find your USNG coordinates:
USNGWeb |
|
| reply to gdm
What are the IPDSLAM tiers provisioned at? Is Elite, for instance, provisioned at exactly 6016/768, or is there supposed to be headroom (i.e. 6400ish) to account for overhead and inevitable losses? |
|
| reply to ivwshane2
I shall answer my own question.
The modems are indeed different. The one they ended up giving me was a 2701HGV-B. It's the same size as the 2wire dsl modem but it's silver and black and has an extra port for a phone line. |
|
| reply to gdm
I ordered uverse Internet only service and was told that my dsl modem would work (2701hg-b) but I've called back a couple of times and I get a different answer everytime:|
Can someone tell me the correct answer? If I can use my existing modem what's the setup process? |
|
