dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
26
share rss forum feed


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
reply to iansltx

Re: $20 is a bad deal...

If (big thought here) AT&T 'really' wanted to do this properly, then they would

a) Create a combined Uverse /microcell terminal
b) Allow AT&T Uverse/DSL users free access for voice/data
if they purchased the equipment.
--
Canada = Hollywood North

iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Austin, TX
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast
Nah, that would result in a loss of income, potentially...despite the fact that it would really help AT&T's cross-platform brand image etc.

Heck, if they allowed cross-microcell roaming U-Verse areas would have nice high data rates and happy AT&T wireless customers, happy U-Verse customers, etc. With U-Verse DSL powering each microcell, most of the time subscribers would see data rates of 5 Mbps down and 1 Mbps up, if not better. Big retention tool versus Verizon and Sprint.


93388818
It's cool, I'm takin it back
Premium
join:2000-03-14
Dallas, TX
reply to en102
said by en102:

If (big thought here) AT&T 'really' wanted to do this properly, then they would

a) Create a combined Uverse /microcell terminal
working on it

MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
kudos:5
said by 93388818:

said by en102:

If (big thought here) AT&T 'really' wanted to do this properly, then they would

a) Create a combined Uverse /microcell terminal
working on it
oooh me want

should I wait? Or is this a 2012 kind of thing?


93388818
It's cool, I'm takin it back
Premium
join:2000-03-14
Dallas, TX
No idea, if you want the 3G MicroCell, I wouldn't wait (once it's available for your area)