site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
212
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

tmc8080

join:2004-04-24
Brooklyn, NY
Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS

too little too late

Why spend 350 million on DSL when 350M on fiber (to another company besides QWEST) will do?

ALL the telcos have used up their good will on lobbying to maintain their MON/DUOpoly status at the expense of consumers AND on the backs of taxpayers for FAR TOO LONG!!! I'd rather give a 3rd party company a shot at millions in subsidies than the incumbents which have PROVEN time and again, no good deed goes un-lapped up by greedy white collar corporate types who write themselves MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR PAYCHECKS while screwing consumers, price gouging them to death and then pulling the wool over their eyes for so long when it comes to the companies cost of providing service versus making excessive profit.

I'd rather see 250,000 FTTP lines deployed than 750,000 vdsl lines deployed. DSL is antiquated technology and the companies making it should go out of business, IMO. Horse and Buggy equipment makers are only in very small shops these days mostly in rural villages or Quaker communities who shun all (most) things modern anyways. All of these electronics come from Asia nowadays.. virtually nothing is made in good old USA anymore. So, until some leadership about replacing copper networks with fiber networks is taken we will have a 3rd world communications swiss cheese network. Any new deployments should either overlay or completely rip up the copper and replace it with fiber. If it means installing new dedicated poles, then so be it. Out in the southwest where qwest is, they aren't exactly strapped for space in most municipalities. We're not talking about the northeast where space is at a commodity premium even in a post FIXED RATE/regulated energy industry economy.

dagg

join:2001-03-25
Galt, CA

1. because the people that we entrust with running the government are too stupid to figure that out on their own.
2. they have only used up their goodwill with those they are intended to serve, not the politicians to whom they donate large campaign contributions effectively making the people they are supposedly service completely unimportant as far as their view of the amount of goodwill thats left.
3. dont bash on the greedy too much. there is a word for people who try to bring products to market with altruistic reasons.... they are called "unemployed". profit drives business, greed drives profit. the real trick is to keep greed in check with common sense and long term planning. companies like qwest let the green run unchecked.

and what many here would like to see is not whats in the best interests of the people in these areas being served. you are setting the stage for companies to be allowed to cherry pick their coverage which gives you what we already have in many places. those areas in which they are likely to not make what the unchecked greedy folks deem as a large enough ROI are going to be left out in the cold.

in the end, the only real way to fix the issue is to clear the path for new companies to come in and leave the old companies to either figure out how to compete or just leave them twisting in the wind until a more streamlined company can come in & buy the assets and start running said company correctly.


sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1

said by dagg:

1. because the people that we entrust with running the government are too stupid to figure that out on their own.
2. they have only used up their goodwill with those they are intended to serve, not the politicians to whom they donate large campaign contributions effectively making the people they are supposedly service completely unimportant as far as their view of the amount of goodwill thats left.
3. dont bash on the greedy too much. there is a word for people who try to bring products to market with altruistic reasons.... they are called "unemployed". profit drives business, greed drives profit. the real trick is to keep greed in check with common sense and long term planning. companies like qwest let the green run unchecked.

and what many here would like to see is not whats in the best interests of the people in these areas being served. you are setting the stage for companies to be allowed to cherry pick their coverage which gives you what we already have in many places. those areas in which they are likely to not make what the unchecked greedy folks deem as a large enough ROI are going to be left out in the cold.

in the end, the only real way to fix the issue is to clear the path for new companies to come in and leave the old companies to either figure out how to compete or just leave them twisting in the wind until a more streamlined company can come in & buy the assets and start running said company correctly.
No private company will do rural fiber when its ROI is 10 or more years. We need government buildouts.

Saturday, 02-Jun 04:58:45 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics