1 edit | reply to sonicmerlin
Re: House Committee not keen on Open Access anyway I was also very concerned at Genechowski's half-assed response to Rep. Rogers. While I give him credit for saying he flat out doesn't agree with the statement that Net Neutrality is the FCC regulating the Internet, he really wussed out on backing up that comment. He should have made the point very clear and in no uncertain terms what exactly Net Neutrality is. Instead, he hid behind the "uhh...well...I inherited this issue from a previous ruling forcing Net Neutrality on a condition of merger." (which btw, AT&T saw enormous growth under those forced regulations »www.fcc.gov/ATT_FINALMergerCommi···2-28.pdf »www.freepress.net/files/Finding_···nt_0.pdf) |
