site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
398
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4

Taxpayers of Manassas got hosed

This network would never have been built if it was forced to rely on private investment. The only reason it did was because government leaders were hoodwinked by the FCC in to building it. The true unfortunates aren't the 520 households that are subscribed to it, but the taxpayers that had to foot the bill for the experiment.


Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

said by Romney2012:

This network would never have been built if it was forced to rely on private investment. The only reason it did was because government leaders were hoodwinked by the FCC in to building it. The true unfortunates aren't the 520 households that are subscribed to it, but the taxpayers that had to foot the bill for the experiment.
An experiment is precisely that, an experiment. If nobody experimented on doing anything (regardless of the funding source), many things would not exist today, like the Internet.

It could have been a real flop from DARPA, at tax-payers expense, too!
--
My Blog 2.0

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD

unfortunately, it was well predicted before this system was even implemented that it was at best a third rate solution to broadband.



Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:30

Yeah, the problems with BPL were pretty well spelled out for any city or town that wanted to investigate it...


eggboard
Premium
join:2000-11-18
Seattle, WA

BPL was the favorite "third pipe" technology of think-tanks and consultants paid by incumbent first and second pipers (DSL and cable) to pretend that there would be competition instead of monopolies and duopolies.

Who knew that revenue-bond-funded muni fiber might emerge as the actual potential third pipe? It has a lot more legs than BPL.

A few years ago, I thought the Current project in Texas would basically jumpstart BPL because of the scope, investors (Google, among others), necessity, mixed broadband/smart-grid properties, deregulated/unbundled market, etc.

Nope. When Current failed to handle TXU's market, that made it clear that this would never work for broadband.

GPON! GPON! GPON! Forever.


Monday, 04-Jun 12:04:14 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics