<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>PC Mag on Crack in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r2410734</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:03:54 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:03:54 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: PC Mag on Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2413854</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/194743"><b>aliasrlz</b></A> : As I said, it has been <B>documented</B> in the linksys forum that large packets will cause the linksys buffer to saturate, lockup, crash, whatever..... then the unit will reset, dropping the connection.  I tested BEFSR41 for several months, 20 minutes into uploading a large file, it crashed, every single time.   I didn't realize it wasn't just my linky, until I read Bill (in Michigan) thorough analysis of what happens to large packets with the linksys.  Btw, he doesn't not recommend the linksys at all for ftping....   <br><br>So far, none of those issues, so far, with the Netgear...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2413854</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 15:12:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: PC Mag on Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2413709</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/345785"><b>youngmoore</b></A> : actully I upload alot, and usually when I do its very large somewhere from 512meg to 1gig.  I have only once had an issue with the linksys.  Netgear is hole different story.  When you have 20 of both you get a better Idea of what makes them tick.  I'm not say the netgear is a trash router, however again I'm saying I would never own another one or use there router in the field.<br><br>ym]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2413709</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 14:54:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: PC Mag on Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2413257</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/194743"><b>aliasrlz</b></A> : apparently , you didn't test uploading of large files, since the linksys "inherently" has a problem with this (regardless of firmware), and it is has been documented in the linksys forum in great detail..... (see some of Bill in Michigan's thorough posts)....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2413257</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 13:50:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PC Mag on Crack</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2410734</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/345785"><b>youngmoore</b></A> : I have to wonder what they where really on when these test were done.  I would use "and do" a linksys any day before ever buying a netgear.  I spent 6 months testing the the netgear and the linksys for a large Telcom for our telecommuters and was very disappointed in its performace.  I also wonder why in the world they didn't test a Nexland router which is pretty much the best router out there just alittle pricey.  Oh and just so you netgear guys don't get to whinny I highly reccomend netgears switches over the linksys or any other non managed hub/switch.  FYI if you guys haven't heard of Nexland  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.nexland.com/products/product.cfm?id=4" >www.nexland.com/products/product.cfm?id=4</A><br><br>Later<br>ym]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2410734</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 04:55:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
