<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>The Gun Defence in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r2412027</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:26:12 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:26:12 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>The Gun Defence</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2412027</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/216197"><b>dnoyeB</b></A> : They should employ the Gun defence as well.<br><br>To date there have been several trials on wether Gun companies should be held liable for what Gun owners do.  I think the precedence has been set and Gun companies are NOT liable.  Just as morpheus is not liable.  <br><br>I personally do not pirate music or anything(though I do have that 1 song which is out of print). But I would not use the service for illegal activity.  Just dialing into my home computer to get music to listen too at work.<br><small>--<br>dnoyeB<br>"Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor <br>man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard. " Ecclesiastes <br>9:16<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,2412027</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 10:46:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
