 Z80APremium
join:2009-11-23
 ·Cox HSI
| reply to how_come
Re: Follow the money I don't abuse the court process. I don't extort subscriber money from providers. So no, I would not get a bloodsucking lawyer to extort $0.50 for subscribers and $3,000,000.00 for the bottom feeding waste of skin ambulance chasing lawyer.
All class actions should be opt in instead of opt out and bloodsucker fees should reflect the amount of WORK they actually did.
Unlike you, I think people should EARN what they make. |
|
| said by Z80A:I don't abuse the court process. I don't extort subscriber money from providers. So no, I would not get a bloodsucking lawyer to extort $0.50 for subscribers and $3,000,000.00 for the bottom feeding waste of skin ambulance chasing lawyer. All class actions should be opt in instead of opt out and bloodsucker fees should reflect the amount of WORK they actually did. Unlike you, I think people should EARN what they make. what?!
this is simply ludicrous, congratulations. and you still did not answer my question. were you to be in court (whatever the reason, criminal or civil, should be obvious I didn't mean class action specifically) would you or would you not represent yourself? certainly you would represent yourself instead of using a blood sucking lawyer right?
"and bloodsucker fees should reflect the amount of WORK they actually did."
so what fees (a number please) would you have them be paid? why should they not get paid what they are able to produce, like everybody else?? this almost sounds like a socialist argument you are making, "they make too much they should make less money, because damn it they're not really earning it!"
"Unlike you, I think people should EARN what they make."
so they didn't earn the money they just went in there and grabbed it out of the air or something?
you are making ludicrous and vaguely socialist sounding arguments.
this is capitalism here, and there are no exceptions. sorry that sometimes your blessed big biz takes some losses, but that's just tough!! |
|
Z80APremium
join:2009-11-23 Reviews:
·Cox HSI
3 edits | I've already explained it to you multiple times. Get hooked on phonics if you still can't follow the simple concept that THESE bloodsuckers didn't earn that money nor were they hired by everyone supposedly damaged.
That $3,000,000.00 comes from the subscribers genius. Surely someone so interested in capitalism realizes that Comcast doesn't print their own money. These are subscribers who weren't given a choice as to how much they wanted to pay for counsel. $3,000,000.00 is obscene by any measure and the result of a corrupt system; laws, written by lawyers, passed by lawyers, for lawyers.
But it doesn't matter how many times I will explain it. You will continue defending this corrupt system where supposed victims are victimized again for the benefit of a bunch of scum-sucking waste of skin ambulance chasers.
Congrats for choosing bloodsuckers over the subscribers. Enjoy your price increases. |
|
| you haven't explained anything. bloodsucker this and bloodsucker that and calling the system corrupt is no argument at all for why they didn't earn that money. it's just sour grapes is what it is!! and 3 million is not near obscene.
i could call a lot of things corrupt and say such and such didn't really earn their money but that doesn't make it so. |
|
