 SandSharkLong may you runPremium,MVM join:2000-05-23 Santa Fe, TX kudos:3 | 42,000 Gallons of Oil... per day from the BP oil rig that exploded and sank in the Gulf. Right now, estimates are that it could take months to get the leak stopped.
Anyone have a guess where all this oil might end up? The nearest threat is to the Louisiana coast and the Mississippi delta area. Louisiana has 40% of the nation's wetlands. I'm wondering how soon the Texas coast might be affected. It was bad enough that so many were injured and killed, but devastation to the wetlands, marine life, coastal birds and mammals could be catastrophic, not to mention the financial impact it could have on the beaches and tourism. |
|
 robbinPremium,MVM join:2000-09-21 Leander, TX kudos:1 | It is starting to look like this could turn very nasty. I think currents will bring it south. Newest estimate is 5000 barrels per day since the accident. I think that makes it 210,000 gallons per day.  |
|
 SandSharkLong may you runPremium,MVM join:2000-05-23 Santa Fe, TX kudos:3 | At that rate, the spill could easily eclipse the worst oil spill in U.S. history the 11 million gallons that leaked from the grounded tanker Exxon Valdez in Alaska's Prince William Sound in 1989 in the three months it could take to drill a relief well and plug the gushing well 5,000 feet underwater on the sea floor.
»news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100430/ap_···sion_284 |
|
|
|
 robbinPremium,MVM join:2000-09-21 Leander, TX kudos:1 | What I heard this evening on NPR is it will do that in 52 days.
It sounded like they are worried about the eastern gulf as opposed to Texas. This may be a good topic for the weather forum as weather seems to be playing a major part of the effort. I think currents are also weather driven. I'll start one if you haven't when I can post from a real computer instead of my iPhone. |
|
 robbinPremium,MVM join:2000-09-21 Leander, TX kudos:1 | For the second day now, choppy seas, high waves and now high winds are hindering efforts to control this spill. I have started a new thread in the weather forum to discuss how weather will play a part in the control and limiting damages.
»Gulf Oil Spill and Weather |
|
 FlippantSo Much For SubtletyPremium,Mod join:2000-06-04 Katy, TX Host: Filesharing Software Earthlink Cable Texas Gulf Coast AT&T U-verse AT&T Southwest
| reply to SandShark The fact that the wellhead cannot be closed is very bad as the well is just dumping in the ocean with no end in site. I am not sure where NPR gets the 52 days, as far as I have heard the best that can be done at this point is drill a relief well. Even if they were to get that drilled in 52 days they would have to pump enough out of the reserve until the pressure was reduced enough for the well to stop spewing. This could be much worse. Pretty much a worse case scenario right now.
No Florida trip this summer. |
|
 robbinPremium,MVM join:2000-09-21 Leander, TX kudos:1 | 52 days is the time it will take to reach the size of the Exxon spill based on 210,000 gal/day. At this point some seem to think the flow could be much higher.
The best I have heard is that it will take about 3 months to get it under control with a new well.
At this point it appears that gulf currents and weather will direct the spill eastward. Really bad if it enters the gulf stream. |
|
 FlippantSo Much For SubtletyPremium,Mod join:2000-06-04 Katy, TX Host: Filesharing Software Earthlink Cable Texas Gulf Coast AT&T U-verse AT&T Southwest
| Ahh that makes sense. I think this has the potential to be a disaster the scope of which we have not seen before and it is at our southern doorstep. All kinds of bad things can occur if this thing continues to spew all summer long. Does anyone know how much of the oil can be picked up in a hurricaine to be dropped on land. Who knows what is going to happen with this. |
|
 robbinPremium,MVM join:2000-09-21 Leander, TX kudos:1 | No idea on how much can be picked up. But I did hear something interesting today on NPR. They were talking about using dispersants on the oil and the comment was that very rough seas can do this naturally. Now they were not talking about a Hurricane and this would be an extremely bad time for one with the well still out of control. Still, it made me think. |
|
 FlippantSo Much For SubtletyPremium,Mod join:2000-06-04 Katy, TX Host: Filesharing Software Earthlink Cable Texas Gulf Coast AT&T U-verse AT&T Southwest
| I do not know much about dispersants. I have doubt that it will make the oil "go away", I think most likely it will break up the oil into smaller parts. The oil is not consumed it is just not so obvious, but I think it will still have a terrible effect on offshore marine life for quite a while.
I see BP is going to try and drop some large inverted funnel looking thing called a containment chamber, that even if exceeds expectations will only stop 80% of the leak. That would still leave 10k barrels a day leak. I sure wish them exceptional success.
On a satirical note, saw t-shits on sale "BP bringing oil to American shores" |
|
 robbinPremium,MVM join:2000-09-21 Leander, TX kudos:1 | According to NPR, this could be an Exxon Valdez every FOUR days.
"sophisticated scientific analysis of seafloor video made available Wednesday by the oil company BP shows that the true figure is closer to 70,000 barrels a day, NPR's Richard Harris reports."
Here's another good read
»www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010···-footage |
|
 FlippantSo Much For SubtletyPremium,Mod join:2000-06-04 Katy, TX Host: Filesharing Software Earthlink Cable Texas Gulf Coast AT&T U-verse AT&T Southwest
| Flow analysis is pretty tough when they do not know the Gas/Oil ratio and have no accurate flow rate coming out of the well. It certainly is a terrible leak and BP needs to really get it fixed asap.
The reports that are coming from hearing are leading to a very mismanaged well operation. It was cost cutting (ie removing the weighted mud early), the casing/cement not holding up, and poor equipment (inadequate BOPs) that led to the "Perfect Blow Out/Leak". There are reports they had pressure data indicating the well was coming back on them and even stopped the mud displacement, but still 11 people died and they were having a safety party while this was happening to boot. Whoever the "company man" was on this well failed in the extreme. |
|
 SandSharkLong may you runPremium,MVM join:2000-05-23 Santa Fe, TX kudos:3 | There was a Frontline story on PBS about 15-20 years ago. The story chronicled a British Petroleum operation around Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, I believe. An employee whistleblower helped document how BP bean counters had calculated how much the operation would produce and tied that information into how little maintenance and overhead would be needed to keep the facility functional before they would abandon it. In other words, BP was maximizing profits over potential environmental disasters and employee safety. I've never forgotten that story. |
|
 FlippantSo Much For SubtletyPremium,Mod join:2000-06-04 Katy, TX Host: Filesharing Software Earthlink Cable Texas Gulf Coast AT&T U-verse AT&T Southwest
| Yeah they are kind of known for having those issues. Look at the plant explosion in Houston that killed people a few years ago. They are far from being "stellar" when it comes to safe operations.
In fact in the Guardian interview the CEO was talking about how much better a job he was doing. I guess 11 killed somehow is an improvement. |
|
 Locutus65Why bother?Premium join:2001-05-24 Houston, TX kudos:1 Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to SandShark I heard today that BP is asking anyone and everyone for better ideas on how to fix this problem. I think the siphon tube they are using is a good idea but they need to use a bigger one. Right now it seems like they are trying to drain a swimming pool with a drinking straw. -- I'm right 98% of the time..... Who cares about the other 3% |
|
 algPassionately apatheticPremium join:2001-04-10 Houston, TX kudos:3 | reply to SandShark My brother used to work on BP owned rigs in Prudhoe Bay. He pretty much refused to work on them after a while. -- This is the way the world ends Not with a bang but a whimper. |
|
 HomunculusPipsquackPremium join:2000-12-14 Dar al-Harb | reply to SandShark Anyone on the coast able to take pics? It seems BP is involved in a huge cover-up... Surprise!
»www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa···ulf.html -- Islam is a hate crime: »www.thememriblog.org |
|
 SandSharkLong may you runPremium,MVM join:2000-05-23 Santa Fe, TX kudos:3 | reply to SandShark It's déjà vu all over again. This makes me very angry.
BP made a series of money-saving shortcuts and blunders that dramatically increased the danger of a destructive oil spill in a well that an engineer ominously described as a "nightmare" just six days before the blowout, according to documents released Monday that provide new insight into the causes of the disaster.
»news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gulf_oil_spill |
|
 SandSharkLong may you runPremium,MVM join:2000-05-23 Santa Fe, TX kudos:3 | reply to SandShark
Estimated Gallons/Barrels Leaked  Department of Energy
2,195,440 barrels
 BP Worst Case
4,351,603 barrels
 Expert's Worst Case
7,801,464 barrels |
|
 SandSharkLong may you runPremium,MVM join:2000-05-23 Santa Fe, TX kudos:3 | reply to SandShark
NOAA Claims Oil Is Mostly Gone In a 5-page report released today, NOAA and the U. S. Geological Survey say only 52.7 million gallons of oil (31 percent) are left of the estimated 172 million gallons that spewed into the Gulf of Mexico from the Deepwater Horizon disaster. NOAA chief Jane Lubchenco said, "Mother Nature is assisting here considerably." She went on to say, "Diluted and out of sight doesn't necessarily mean benign."
Some experts believe the NOAA explanation of what happened to the oil that wasn't captured, burned, skimmed, chemically dispersed, or evaporated is mostly spin and that making these types of claims are "overly optimistic". Not only that, it could end up helping BP save billions of dollars in damages and that ""BP attorneys are placing this in plastic and putting this in frames."
Full story here - Looking for the oil? NOAA says it's mostly gone |
|